From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: Xen and gfn_to_pfn_cache changes for 6.9
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:02:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24e827c3-ea16-4197-8699-f35d67fa9c6a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308223702.1350851-9-seanjc@google.com>
On 3/8/24 23:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Aaaand seeing my one commit in the shortlog made me realize I completely forgot
> to get acks from s390 on the kvm_is_error_gpa() => kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()
> refactor. Fudge.
>
> s390 folks, my apologies for not reaching out earlier. Please take a look at
> commit 9e7325acb3dc ("KVM: s390: Refactor kvm_is_error_gpa() into
> kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()"). It *should* be a straight refactor, and I don't
> expect the rename to be contentious, but I didn't intend to send this pull request
> before getting an explicit ack.
kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot() is not my preferred name for this function but
it's way better than kvm_is_error_gpa() so I'm fine with it.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 22:36 [GIT PULL] KVM: x86 pull requests " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: Async #PF changes " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: Common MMU " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: x86: Misc " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: x86: MMU " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-14 18:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-14 18:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-14 18:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: x86: PMU " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:36 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: x86: Selftests " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-11 14:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-12 23:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-14 18:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-08 22:37 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: x86: VMX " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-03-08 22:37 ` [GIT PULL] KVM: Xen and gfn_to_pfn_cache " Sean Christopherson
2024-03-11 14:02 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-03-11 14:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24e827c3-ea16-4197-8699-f35d67fa9c6a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®