From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
To: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git pull on Linux/ACPI release tree
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:05:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <252A408D-0B42-49F3-92BC-B80F94F19F40@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90601092238r3476556apf948bfe5247da484@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 10, 2006, at 01:38, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On 1/10/06, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com> wrote:
>> If they all work, then we know precisely that it's the
>> interactions between them, which also makes debugging a lot easier.
>
> The more complex your tree structure is, the more the interactions
> are likely to be part of the problem. Is git-bisect not useful in
> this scenario?
IIRC git-bisect just does an outright linearization of the whole tree
anyways, which makes git-bisect work everywhere, even in the presence
of difficult cross-merges. On the other hand, if you are git-
bisecting ACPI changes (perhaps due to some ACPI breakage), and ACPI
has 10 pulls from mainline, you _also_ have to wade through the
bisection of any other changes that occurred in mainline, even if
they're totally irrelevant. This is why it's useful to only pull
mainline into your tree (EX: ACPI) when you functionally depend on
changes there (as Linus so eloquently expounded upon).
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Q: Why do programmers confuse Halloween and Christmas?
A: Because OCT 31 == DEC 25.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-10 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-09 8:05 Brown, Len
2006-01-09 16:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 22:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-01-09 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 23:34 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-10 2:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-10 6:33 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-10 6:38 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-10 18:05 ` Kyle Moffett [this message]
2006-01-10 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-10 18:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-01-10 19:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-10 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-13 23:35 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-01-11 3:32 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-01-09 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-01-10 15:31 ` Alex Riesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-09 7:34 Brown, Len
2006-01-09 10:11 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-09 12:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-01-09 6:27 Brown, Len
2006-01-09 6:13 Brown, Len
2006-01-09 5:55 linux
2006-01-09 5:53 Brown, Len
2006-01-09 6:08 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-09 6:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 6:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-01-08 18:28 Brown, Len
2006-01-08 19:19 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-08 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-01-08 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-08 20:50 ` Tony Luck
2006-01-08 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-08 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-08 21:20 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-01-09 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-08 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-08 23:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 23:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-09 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 4:34 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-10 20:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-10 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-10 20:33 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-01-12 1:37 ` Greg KH
2006-01-12 16:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-13 14:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 7:47 Brown, Len
2006-01-08 8:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-08 8:16 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-08 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 0:48 ` Al Viro
2006-01-09 3:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-01 8:05 Len Brown
2005-12-06 8:17 ` Len Brown
2005-12-23 5:42 ` Len Brown
2006-01-07 15:54 ` Len Brown
2006-01-07 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=252A408D-0B42-49F3-92BC-B80F94F19F40@mac.com \
--to=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®