From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756358AbcJZBXp (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:23:45 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:42938 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753335AbcJZBXo (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:23:44 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,548,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="23684735" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] perf report: Show branch flags/cycles in --branch-history callgraph view To: Andi Kleen References: <1477444503-25434-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20161026011929.GG1075@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: <254e310b-5130-489a-916f-7118b7b11fb7@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:23:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161026011929.GG1075@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If I change it to, for example: removed iterations: 20% Is that OK? Thanks Jin Yao On 10/26/2016 9:19 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> | | >> | |--29.93%--main div.c:39 (predicted:50.6%, cycles:1, removed loops:12954) > > Removed loops should be divided by the number of samples to normalize it. > > Also I would call it "iterations" > > -Andi