From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43687C4332F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 05:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233314AbiKHFwI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 00:52:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230154AbiKHFwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2022 00:52:06 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6FB2DA8C; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references: subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lsrFGeuHZ9wh8asjvxV7/MIVVp+g7KTY9yxrdvD0P6c=; b=UWLpBxlDy/VnAHHLh1j7OGv93INeQFb4X2fth/yxf6QW/qB4xy02eUmw qHlEzYkmm9meSFlp7ymIezuH6ykcq4B6zaQ5ZNSz3oMF0X/EmzjCUcFOt ECOJwaH7JXu2Mr3mvs9oQLZhiRyF442P/iiESZjTcsj2hvRtz7+ZUlQyn M=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=julia.lawall@inria.fr; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@zcs-store9.inria.fr Received-SPF: SoftFail (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of julia.lawall@inria.fr is inclined to not designate 128.93.142.36 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=128.93.142.36; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="julia.lawall@inria.fr"; x-sender="julia.lawall@inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@zcs-store9.inria.fr) identity=helo; client-ip=128.93.142.36; receiver=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="julia.lawall@inria.fr"; x-sender="postmaster@zcs-store9.inria.fr"; x-conformance=spf_only X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,145,1665439200"; d="scan'208";a="77134485" X-MGA-submission: =?us-ascii?q?MDEs0A+XODSBwig36FY8W1LHf9eQB1swn5ImB2?= =?us-ascii?q?RJVGBYwaOpOX5VeMpKjrHc00AoyGbu3XqmnQSTYBPYnZrEn/sj4nrnsV?= =?us-ascii?q?OS4cDKK44TcnrkpMcOfEy0MDS92UrHy8Z3joTvvnC8mrytnfaRRWEz41?= =?us-ascii?q?rvLlpTwYsyE/jUq56bqOVtow=3D=3D?= Received: from zcs-store9.inria.fr ([128.93.142.36]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2022 06:51:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:51:53 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Markus Elfring , cocci@inria.fr, kernel-janitors , nicolas palix , linux-kernel , kernel@pengutronix.de Message-ID: <257596884.6156222.1667886713273.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20221107200815.u7hcwejileeabnct@pengutronix.de> References: <20221107114702.15706-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20221107200815.u7hcwejileeabnct@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: api: Don't use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource with res==NULL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [122.11.248.245] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4464 (ZimbraWebClient - FF106 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4468) Thread-Topic: coccinelle: api: Don't use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource with res==NULL Thread-Index: SY9eA2PxzCVONI9yuvNaH3ovzzKcCw== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > After uninstalling python2 this ends in: > > Cannot find Python library > coccicheck failed > make: *** [Makefile:2076: coccicheck] Error 255 > > Didn't try to debug that any further. Is that worth a bug report against > coccinelle (which is shipped by my distribution)? > > I tried to adapt the org and report modes from other patches in the same > directory. So a critical glimpse by someone more knowledgable than me is > recommended. However I don't know how to react to "I doubt ... is > appropriate", I'd need a more constructive feedback to act on. I'm not a python expert, so I'm not sure what to do about this python2 vs python3 problem. Is there some strategy for printing that works in both of them? julia