From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com" <kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com>,
"ltp@lists.linux.it" <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] btrfs potential failure on 32 core LTP test (fallocate05)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 20:06:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2576a472-1c99-889a-685c-a12bbfb08052@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b6a502a-8db8-ef27-f48e-5001f351ef24@toxicpanda.com>
On 29/06/2021 19:28, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 6/29/21 1:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/06/2021 19:24, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On 6/29/21 1:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Dear BTRFS folks,
>>>>
>>>> I am hitting a potential regression of btrfs, visible only with
>>>> fallocate05 test from LTP (Linux Test Project) only on 32+ core Azure
>>>> instances (x86_64).
>>>>
>>>> Tested:
>>>> v5.8 (Ubuntu with our stable patches): PASS
>>>> v5.11 (Ubuntu with our stable patches): FAIL
>>>> v5.13 mainline: FAIL
>>>>
>>>> PASS means test passes on all instances
>>>> FAIL means test passes on other instance types (e.g. 4 or 16 core) but
>>>> fails on 32 and 64 core instances (did not test higher),
>>>> e.g.: Standard_F32s_v2, Standard_F64s_v2, Standard_D32s_v3,
>>>> Standard_E32s_v3
>>>>
>>>> Reproduction steps:
>>>> git clone https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git
>>>> cd ltp
>>>> ./build.sh && make install -j8
>>>> cd ../ltp-install
>>>> sudo ./runltp -f syscalls -s fallocate05
>>>>
>>>> Failure output:
>>>> tst_test.c:1379: TINFO: Testing on btrfs
>>>> tst_test.c:888: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop4 with btrfs opts='' extra opts=''
>>>> tst_test.c:1311: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file0 size 21710183
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file1 size 8070086
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file2 size 3971177
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file3 size 36915315
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file4 size 70310993
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file5 size 4807935
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file6 size 90739786
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file7 size 76896492
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file8 size 72228649
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file9 size 36207821
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:32: TINFO: Creating file mntpoint/file10 size 81483962
>>>> tst_fill_fs.c:59: TINFO: write(): ENOSPC (28)
>>>> fallocate05.c:81: TPASS: write() wrote 65536 bytes
>>>> fallocate05.c:102: TINFO: fallocate()d 0 extra blocks on full FS
>>>> fallocate05.c:114: TPASS: fallocate() on full FS
>>>> fallocate05.c:130: TPASS: fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
>>>> fallocate05.c:134: TFAIL: write(): ENOSPC (28)
>>>>
>>>> Test code:
>>>> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate05.c#L134
>>>>
>>>> See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1933112
>>>>
>>>> Other FS tests succeed on that machines/kernels. Other file systems
>>>> also pass - only btrfs fails. The issue was not bisected. Full test
>>>> log attached.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Also it looks like you're using a loop device, the instructions you gave me
>>> aren't complete enough for me to reproduce. What is the actual setup you are
>>> using? How big is your loop device? Is it a backing device? I had to do -b
>>> <device> to get the test to even start to run, but I've got a 2tib ssd, am I
>>> supposed to be using something else? Thanks,
>>
>> The test takes care about loop device, nothing is needed from your side.
>> Just run the test and wait till you see:
>> "tst_test.c:1379: TINFO: Testing on btrfs"
>>
>> That's where the interesting part starts :)
>>
>
> *cough*
> # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP is not set
> *cough*
>
> I think I found the problem, my bad,
>
Minor update - it's not only Azure's. AWS m5.8xlarge and m5.16xlarge (32
and 64 cores) fail similarly. I'll try later also QEMU machines with
different amount of CPUs.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 17:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-29 17:20 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-29 17:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-30 11:21 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-06-30 11:29 ` Petr Vorel
2021-06-29 17:24 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-29 17:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-29 17:28 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-29 18:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-06-29 18:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-29 18:32 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-30 8:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-29 20:14 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-30 6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2576a472-1c99-889a-685c-a12bbfb08052@canonical.com \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®