From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 03:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25822023.SGCZQcEZuy@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPdjkO4ZvQ1kijfVCMKaNBaoYDEOZpQ-+ZmyWVpL1jdPpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, August 19, 2016 03:26:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > It is useful to know the reason why cpufreq_update_util() has just
> > been called and that can be passed as flags to cpufreq_update_util()
> > and to the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data. However,
> > doing that in addition to passing the util and max arguments they
> > already take would be clumsy, so avoid it.
> >
> > Instead, use the observation that the schedutil governor is part
> > of the scheduler proper, so it can access scheduler data directly.
> > This allows the util and max arguments of cpufreq_update_util()
> > and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data to be replaced
> > with a flags one, but schedutil has to be modified to follow.
> >
> > Thus make the schedutil governor obtain the CFS utilization
> > information from the scheduler and use the "RT" and "DL" flags
> > instead of the special utilization value of ULONG_MAX to track
> > updates from the RT and DL sched classes. Make it non-modular
> > too to avoid having to export scheduler variables to modules at
> > large.
> >
> > Next, update all of the other users of cpufreq_update_util()
> > and the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data accordingly.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2: Do not check cpu_of(rq) against smp_processor_id() in
> > cfs_rq_util_change().
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 5 --
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 -
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 -
> > include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++--
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq.c | 2 -
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 4 +-
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +----
> > kernel/sched/rt.c | 4 +-
> > kernel/sched/sched.h | 31 +++++------------
> > 10 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> (...)
>
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
> > If in doubt, say N.
> >
> > config CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
> > - tristate "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
> > + bool "'schedutil' cpufreq policy governor"
>
> If you change such symbols please remember to update also all the
> defconfigs. Without the update they start to show errors.
Are there defconfigs that use this particular one?
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-20 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 0:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-12 0:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:15 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-19 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-20 1:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-08-20 15:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-22 17:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-24 4:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-12 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass runqueue pointer " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-15 22:16 ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-16 9:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments Viresh Kumar
2016-08-16 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25822023.SGCZQcEZuy@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®