From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756355AbYAIUoq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:44:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753661AbYAIUoi (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:44:38 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:42378 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752669AbYAIUoi (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:44:38 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Pavel Roskin , benh@kernel.crashing.org, Dave Airlie , Pekka Paalanen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbeulich@novell.com Subject: Re: Replacement for page fault notifiers? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:26:44 GMT." <20080109202644.GA5514@infradead.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20080108210638.5c9e093a@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> <20080108203235.GA772@infradead.org> <21d7e9970801081413n307ab07aq462a9fff014143ae@mail.gmail.com> <1199838407.6734.83.camel@pasglop> <1199902724.8050.11.camel@dv> <20080109182157.GA32754@infradead.org> <1199908703.6734.133.camel@pasglop> <1199910256.11485.14.camel@dv> <20080109202644.GA5514@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1199911462_3223P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:44:22 -0500 Message-ID: <25871.1199911462@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1199911462_3223P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:26:44 GMT, Christoph Hellwig said: > > Exactly. In MadWifi, they are inlined on i386 and x86_64, and I cannot > > ask every user with an unsupported card to get a Mac. > > Maybe it's time to do some simple xoring in the ioremap return value > to force them not to do such stupid things.. If an open-source driver did exactly the same thing, would it still be stupid? If so, what should it be doing instead? --==_Exmh_1199911462_3223P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHhTImcC3lWbTT17ARAoIBAKDoAzI83/4f6eCA7eZ0ykJXIEhHEwCg6LmA vHRJspxOTiAzntiW/DHvAew= =1m8A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1199911462_3223P--