From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18711F9F7A; Fri, 23 May 2025 08:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747989541; cv=none; b=laVPyiyDL/HkbFi931unPgVsqY0fm5t0O5Oq55XFfOvDogYArriG0ObNk6mKxv7xiUCLgR7tRhRJR1/rhd+an57zbUizRmBuXv4xrEz2GHDtDeC1waAvHMl3scft6DwfINFVYVFWvcysgt6pL+P8kj6Yo46n+j6CQWr14umpV7E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747989541; c=relaxed/simple; bh=msYNVRIJaIicsmP+EDUll+WhrqYovk4p5HwXJzc9dn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vtmn0jLUNv0wNh1J6rH/nyxncCyQGtDGweuAwQMJbOXm4ho7wyraPT/c5s2vBsHVf/gpNBHOlpP/WHbmefbPLwY2CVvby87L4ca4QxBPJ4jd9cbFDhoWvBN3hbaf7ePecT6j72RJgnBjg66flsKUMPFBzvvlsDlVM3epXyGktwM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b=cMxgzX38; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b="cMxgzX38" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1747989530; bh=msYNVRIJaIicsmP+EDUll+WhrqYovk4p5HwXJzc9dn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cMxgzX38qt26870aBPdidhOIzrroJi6dU5AIsPz3xXOutDgIDIvHwvWYU2Zcvsxtd 50rvnl0ElSYiLRxos6fb1HNbE8TGez7LTr85RH5OwSl0D+97idMQzz7b6tll8eFgxc X6img7f3rF/vhKceJuMpupJQSwm5D42haJt4S1I4= Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 10:33:13 +0200 From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: Mark Brown Cc: Willy Tarreau , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] tools/nolibc: move ioctl() to sys/ioctl.h Message-ID: <25a18e14-8ac9-4ac8-8907-a087050b1eb6@t-8ch.de> References: <20250515-nolibc-sys-v1-0-74f82eea3b59@weissschuh.net> <20250515-nolibc-sys-v1-1-74f82eea3b59@weissschuh.net> <89bb5a3e-dd6c-475d-9c5d-0bd1595be735@t-8ch.de> <744a1aa8-1efc-4c20-b45e-070fc038f6e8@sirena.org.uk> <198bf1a8-98d0-4693-a4cf-234cad728c9b@t-8ch.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On 2025-05-21 19:49:39+0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 03:45:42PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Or you could run your testsuite with the new nolibc for-next branch > > which should be fixed now. > > That seems to build with 869c788909b93a78ead1ca28c42b95eeb0779215 which > is the current HEAD of: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git for-next Thanks for testing! To be sure, was this your full test-run? Or did you do a full test-run on linux-next in the meantime? I'd like to get your confirmation before sending these changes to Linus. Thomas