mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com,
	sbrivio@redhat.com, daniel.baluta@gmail.com,
	nramas@linux.microsoft.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
	Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: Remove unnecessary conditions
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:21:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25a1aca2c993ecb70ba7cd9c9e38bce9170a98b0.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313102912.17218-1-shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>

On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 15:59 +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> Remove unnecessary if and else conditions since both are leading to the
> initialization of "phtpriv->ampdu_enable" with the same value.
> Also, remove the unnecessary else-if condition since it does nothing.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
[]
> @@ -2772,16 +2772,7 @@ void rtw_update_ht_cap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pie, uint ie_len, u8 channe
>  
>  	/* maybe needs check if ap supports rx ampdu. */
>  	if (!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1) {
> -		if (pregistrypriv->wifi_spec == 1) {
> -			/* remove this part because testbed AP should disable RX AMPDU */
> -			/* phtpriv->ampdu_enable = false; */
> -			phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
> -		} else {
> -			phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
> -		}
> -	} else if (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2) {
> -		/* remove this part because testbed AP should disable RX AMPDU */
> -		/* phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true; */
> +		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;

This isn't the same test.

This could be:
 	if ((!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1)) ||
	    pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;

Though it is probably more sensible to just set
phtpriv->ampdu_enable without testing whether or
not it's already set:

	if (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1 ||
	    pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
		phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-13 10:29 Shreeya Patel
2020-03-13 21:21 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-03-14 11:28   ` Shreeya Patel
2020-03-15  4:32     ` Joe Perches
2020-03-15 21:27 ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25a1aca2c993ecb70ba7cd9c9e38bce9170a98b0.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®