From: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
To: Andy Chiu <tchiu@tenstorrent.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, andybnac@gmail.com,
dfustini@oss.tenstorrent.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] riscv: optimize mode switch latency for Vector
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 04:01:19 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25b31a4c-5034-6740-eef1-1c2a60748398@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918215154.2481482-1-tchiu@tenstorrent.com>
On Fri, 18 Sep 2026, Andy Chiu wrote:
> This series provide several optimizations targeting system call latency
> regarding vector context management. Before the series, the kernel
> handled user's vector context in an conservative way, where registers
> were null out and VS is tracked as DIRTY. This introduce excess context
> saving and restoring when there is a context swicth. Also, the kernel
> turned off Vector at the exception entry, making all in-kernel vector
> usecase take the serialization cost, which includes context switch and
> user copies. The cost is not easy to hide as vector code are usually sit
> right after enabling V.
>
> Since vector register are set to a known state at syscall exit, the
> series set VS to INIT at syscall entry and null out the vector register
> at the exit, skipping unnecessary saves and restores. The series also
> introduce riscv_novstateopt, when unset, enables vector in the kernel
> mode, and do not perform register nulling on the syscall fast path,
> where there is no context switch or kernel-mode vector during the
> syscall.
>
> With the whole series, nginx request throughput vs base on a four-core
> Ascalon-S, by served page size (* = statistically distinct):
>
> 86B 1KB 2KB 4KB 8KB 16KB 32KB
> v5 +0.79%* +1.36%* +2.33%* +2.02%* +0.14% +0.93% +2.42%*
> v6 +0.33%* -0.23% +2.88%* +2.19%* +1.02% +1.14% +1.40%*
>
> This series depends on [1], which is now queued in the KVM RISC-V tree
> [2]. For those who prefer git, the series is also available at [3].
Thanks. Given the KVM fixes dependency, it's probably best to wait to
merge most of these until v7.5. But I think it's OK to pick up 1, 2, and
3? Will queue those for v7.4.
- Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 21:51 Andy Chiu
2026-10-06 9:40 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2026-10-06 10:01 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25b31a4c-5034-6740-eef1-1c2a60748398@kernel.org \
--to=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=dfustini@oss.tenstorrent.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=tchiu@tenstorrent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®