From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from va-1-112.ptr.blmpb.com (va-1-112.ptr.blmpb.com [209.127.230.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286372E736F for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 03:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.127.230.112 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780025001; cv=none; b=mG/SH1Zk22VBVm6kjl1lWgevC9TD7Znc7oW+FIsWCXswDlBe2IKYYOD4ESBA5rva4fHtquW/qy95+mRvB6KHj0yxgFx98cyKoVHnUH0P/ylPX+8N43t6wFvz1sxEkxxNsXQLib9s3P7TM2Uif2Edl2N0WYfZ/3DoJu8wbWr1+Fs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780025001; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2LGArvuYWkvhMOQ2aooN5iWkNT+hWI6mVPFhkVOEL14=; h=Date:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Message-Id:From: Subject:To:Mime-Version; b=UA0uNrS/5IaV7AUbxhLyJAhD2yG19V5XR2Q0dVY+96o2PotqxMquRdZ9CRycpuA7gprd4nGXX+Ni7+rcdljesi4TkyZJ/sD0tbZD7mqahlC0z92kzuAQG1vw04X7j0UQdlsKjGaVdmQE92TV8CDEBswS6MXfTPlVLB37FBu1Xlc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b=PwybMdy1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.127.230.112 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bytedance.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b="PwybMdy1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2212171451; d=bytedance.com; t=1780024993; h=from:subject: mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:reply-to:content-type: mime-version:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=c2Fo3pBcfXiYbVFnCHu0LNIwEBG+KHxMJ7+g9T7c8/M=; b=PwybMdy1jbujim+lHjL8b780Avze8XUdVtlf9oRg/I7SFxwyf7Vp08elCap4Gr216j1Qi3 9zwRDlUHfetpJl78oqYnjFCEHCTVgDCRBx1G8LWcPNN6MJAj/rL9ubRJ14eaN6GGIz+sm5 IXCNWfXxeOV8XaCGaImvKWtWlv3uzqxPm84l3BpouY+JpDCJUR7oQSFPpXyiPPOs82w1V9 T8pisMdODDDeZcFmsAfOSr9Q4nrmmsbFcK4dB5zQz8PhApMxhoJsN9iisWpZjezO2XBc9e 85NsWvJizjaGEoMosIBw11cb98MqyEtmt3hMFstu3BXcmyn27Gh13D2OmrgqlQ== Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:22:48 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <20260528151338.617843-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , Message-Id: <25c6dbe4-1f59-4ac0-a9ed-eac0c0be9e97@bytedance.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Lms-Return-Path: X-Original-From: Chuyi Zhou From: "Chuyi Zhou" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 On 2026-05-29 3:47 a.m., Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 11:13:26PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote: >> Changes in v6: >> - Make the task-local cpumask selection explicit and drop preemptible() >> check in smp_call_function_many_cond(). The early put_cpu() decision now >> depends only on whether a task-local cpumask is available. >> - Keep smp_task_ipi_mask() private to kernel/smp.c in [PATCH v6 4/12]. >> - Add #include to kernel/smp.c in [PATCH v6 4/12] for >> kmalloc()/kfree(), fixing the kernel test robot build failure reported >> at: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605241101.w6T2LApw-lkp@intel.com/ >> - Update the csd_lock_wait() comment in [PATCH v6 6/12]. >> - Add Sebastian's Reviewed-by tags to the reviewed patches. > > For the series: > > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney > Thanks Paul, much appreciated! I will carry your Tested-by tag if I need to post another revision.