From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.3]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C1D27E7EF; Thu, 8 May 2025 16:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746720864; cv=none; b=E+DYO1z+Kdlr0HspiRtgLZTGd154bdbuoVHbHieXcEovpodIMbMsdZ/gxIJ6GmFqUA5YtJWjZ0/UO/mhYhblTto/eJJZp/js4jHqyL9Lx60CfXEtQUz34Tvta/haSbCmsW2Sis2Vxw5cs9Ex8rzfTiDvaR3HEYGhBuiCTGlB7FA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746720864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hX5iMWpZ9yceRFUoRBf9NqUVir64zEn65k32D5jq2AQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tXzo/TywFNsYdA3pfIaAvREzeLaHViUQPzjY98EVJr9eHPYKGb80SfoyOOvNiqdd+7yIpF/+CHjZbe8Xj6EPIb5mzctvegzaxBmCTBcOm67W1GSKd+5Y4/3HmPwNqktkQav8ZB6Sf79wnQ5jddekDF72Zft0NSkL6UB93t5T+90= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=nO8XRuLa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="nO8XRuLa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=81aBPS6yBfZnl27zRH7ZXiOuAu20NzRTJepaZfWeHBs=; b=nO8XRuLaqeMEuHMiGg9pJfKjkfKjM+1nBX1d2T192PZgLu6UTTHVGO6dXzLDW0 cf/AsM6lG5pEV67BuhdNNSy0k9bRt19USAk9majVuVTNoA4jdIixL8ThyfVnZqF0 HUDD0DJf8rE0C9zNyn9/2YPnlyot7ejFIaDGGmtjL04wY= Received: from [192.168.71.93] (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-0 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wAXJmHo1xxoaC4OAA--.307S2; Fri, 09 May 2025 00:12:25 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <25c89e3c-9625-49ac-b816-945ab9145f87@163.com> Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 00:12:24 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: aardvark: Remove redundant MPS configuration To: Niklas Cassel Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= , lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, yue.wang@amlogic.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, khilman@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org References: <20250506173439.292460-1-18255117159@163.com> <20250506173439.292460-4-18255117159@163.com> <20250506174110.63ayeqc4scmwjj6e@pali> <8a6adc24-5f40-4f22-9842-b211e1ef5008@163.com> <20250507163620.53v5djmhj3ywrge2@pali> Content-Language: en-US From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wAXJmHo1xxoaC4OAA--.307S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7Jr18XF48WF4Uur1kXF1xAFb_yoWkCrbE9r 9IkrWxC3WUGan7Crs7Krn3ArWqqayDZ345W34Fy3y3A3s8ArW5uFs0k3ZaqF1rtay3KF4q kryYvF1jkrW29jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUbku45UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: rpryjkyvrrlimvzbiqqrwthudrp/xtbBDwpGo2gbipOKhwACsF On 2025/5/8 19:53, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Hello Hans, > > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:47:12AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote: >> On 2025/5/8 00:36, Pali Rohár wrote: >>> >>> Sorry, but I stopped doing any testing of the aardvark driver with the >>> mainline kernel after PCI maintainers stopped taking fixes for the >>> driver and stopped responding. >>> >>> I'm not going to debug same issues again, which I have analyzed, >>> prepared fixes, sent patches and see no progress there. >>> >>> Seems that there is a status quo, and I'm not going to change it. >> >> Dear Niklas, >> >> Do you have any opinion on Pali's reply? Should patch 3/3 be discarded? > > While I do have an opinion, I'm not going to share it on a public mailing > list :) > > With regards to your patch 3/3, I think that your patch looks fine, but if > the driver maintainer does not want the cleanup for >reasons*, that is totally > fine with me. However, I'm not a PCI maintainer, so my opinion does not really > matter. It's the PCI maintainers that decide. > Dear Niklas, Thank you very much for your reply. Let's wait for the decision of the PCI maintainer on this series of patches. Best regards, Hans