From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cpufreq: Use USEC_PER_SEC for deadline task
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:17:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25da50cb-776f-42db-9821-e86a441259c0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtD_QzYVeTbQ-j2mOsKmCcjUaxo403M_HYCWbT2RjjGb7w@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/13/24 08:54, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 09:42, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/08/24 02:24, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>> Adding more sched folks to CC
>>>
>>> On 08/06/24 14:41, Christian Loehle wrote:
>>>> Convert the sugov deadline task attributes to use the available
>>>> definitions to make them more readable.
>>>> No functional change.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>>>> index eece6244f9d2..012b38a04894 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
>>>> @@ -654,9 +654,9 @@ static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
>>>> * Fake (unused) bandwidth; workaround to "fix"
>>>> * priority inheritance.
>>>> */
>>>> - .sched_runtime = 1000000,
>>>> - .sched_deadline = 10000000,
>>>> - .sched_period = 10000000,
>>>> + .sched_runtime = USEC_PER_SEC,
>>>> + .sched_deadline = 10 * USEC_PER_SEC,
>>>> + .sched_period = 10 * USEC_PER_SEC,
>>>
>>> I think NSEC_PER_MSEC is the correct one. The units in
>>> include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h is not specified. Had to look at
>>> sched-deadline.rst to figure it out.
Huh, that's what I used, see below.
>>
>> In practice it's the same number :). But, you are correct, we want
>> 1ms/10ms and unit is nanoseconds, so NSEC_PER_MSEC.
>
> Yes NSEC_PER_MSEC is the correct unit
Thank you Qais, Juri and Vincent, but if I'm not missing something we
have a contradiction.
This patch should indeed be NSEC_PER_MSEC and I'll send a v2 but:
- Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst talks about microseconds:
SCHED_DEADLINE [18] uses three parameters, named "runtime", "period", and
"deadline", to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task should receive
"runtime" microseconds of execution time every "period" microseconds, and
these "runtime" microseconds are available within "deadline" microseconds
from the beginning of the period.
- sched_setattr / sched_getattr manpages talks about nanoseconds:
sched_deadline
This field specifies the "Deadline" parameter for deadline
scheduling. The value is expressed in nanoseconds.
- include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h doesn't mention any unit.
I will add that to the v2 series.
- kernel/sched/deadline.c works with nanoseconds internally (although
with the precision limitation in microseconds).
No conversion so
attr->sched_deadline (uapi) == dl_se->dl_deadline (kernel) etc.
So Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.rst is false or what is it that
I'm missing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 13:41 Christian Loehle
2024-08-09 1:24 ` Qais Yousef
2024-08-09 7:42 ` Juri Lelli
2024-08-13 7:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-08-13 10:17 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2024-08-13 13:19 ` Juri Lelli
2024-08-13 13:34 ` Christian Loehle
2024-08-13 13:57 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25da50cb-776f-42db-9821-e86a441259c0@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®