From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: al.stone@linaro.org
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
robert.moore@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] ACPI: move _OSI support functions to allow arch-dependent implementation
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:09:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2609016.EPbkEHRv6B@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424824585-6405-7-git-send-email-al.stone@linaro.org>
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 05:36:22 PM al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
>
> Having moved the _OSI callback function needed by ACPICA from
> drivers/acpi/osl.c to drivers/acpi/osi.c, we now move all the
> remaining _OSI support functions to osi.c.
>
> This patch is much larger than I had wanted it to be; several of the
> functions that implemented acpi_osi* command line options, or did the
> set up of the interfaces to be provided by _OSI, shared a static struct.
> Hence, I ended up moving a bunch of code at once rather than perhaps a
> function at a time.
>
> With this patch, all the _OSI-associated code has now been moved
> to osi.c, and we next change the build so that we can make the
> _OSI implementation arch-dependent.
>
> There is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/osi.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 187 ---------------------------------------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +-
> 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osi.c b/drivers/acpi/osi.c
> index f23aa70..9943b7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osi.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("osi");
>
> #define PREFIX "ACPI: "
>
> +static void __init acpi_osi_setup_late(void);
> +
> /*
> * The story of _OSI(Linux)
> *
> @@ -68,10 +70,14 @@ static struct osi_linux {
> unsigned int dmi:1;
> unsigned int cmdline:1;
> unsigned int default_disabling:1;
> -} osi_linux = {0, 0, 0, 0};
> + unsigned int interfaces_added:1;
> +} osi_linux = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
>
> u32 acpi_osi_handler(acpi_string interface, u32 supported)
> {
> + if (!osi_linux.interfaces_added)
> + acpi_osi_setup_late();
> +
This wasn't there in the old code.
Please don't mix moving code around with adding new things to it.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 0:36 [PATCH v3 0/9] Start deprecating _OSI on new architectures al.stone
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] ACPI: fix all errors reported by cleanpatch.pl in osl.c al.stone
2015-02-25 12:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-04 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:56 ` Al Stone
2015-03-05 0:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 0:06 ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] ACPI: clear up warnings on use of printk reported by checkpatch.pl al.stone
2015-02-25 12:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 20:56 ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for various bits of syntax al.stone
2015-02-25 12:59 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] ACPI: clean up checkpatch warnings for items with possible semantic value al.stone
2015-02-25 13:08 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 20:57 ` Al Stone
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ACPI: move acpi_os_handler() so it can be made arch-dependent later al.stone
2015-02-25 13:47 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Hanjun Guo
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] ACPI: move _OSI support functions to allow arch-dependent implementation al.stone
2015-03-04 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] ACPI: enable arch-specific compilation for _OSI and the blacklist al.stone
2015-03-04 23:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] ACPI: arm64: use an arch-specific ACPI _OSI method and ACPI blacklist al.stone
2015-03-02 17:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-02 19:00 ` Al Stone
2015-03-04 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 10:17 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-05 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 23:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] ACPI: arm64: use "Linux" as ACPI_OS_NAME for _OS on arm64 al.stone
2015-03-04 23:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2609016.EPbkEHRv6B@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®