From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 544BC171E4D for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714485301; cv=none; b=ews8p9m8stgt2Z4SXNHLhfS7jfEwMahxYp2DMzgPi5SnphjiLOnWIFWBaMWCbRtUSUHbhtY+NmBfycyy0ZjezFKuNaQyhqL771REXxVfWh/l8g7r3hZp2aIxA6LI34OhFR6nJLuTpef8QPChKalTgIZv1ZTPRw5qmkYTKMRkbIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714485301; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/nhvSoPlU3gbi4AJGgHtqm6XNGJevnMBIdpvHTnCxWE=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=bkCS4Ok+S96VacUG6cRFaPbpq8O7/pOk1pyrCxxJzFmKSfgyEU/V9JBHxE94zOE+fT5h7H98v0lfkhlQblkOVx6PVaAEHwY2XGsLIW05uoDBAt9qZgnW/YZ7qsWSnI3lzgx92+BLD8+dt88o/D+H9CUe5NKFLLuxPDOP2mHT248= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=aa63shyu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="aa63shyu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1714485299; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/nhvSoPlU3gbi4AJGgHtqm6XNGJevnMBIdpvHTnCxWE=; b=aa63shyujqR9v7B1N565TPPzoTyWBLCiTr5nI8w5eCDyoLCJQXaxULvpyMNvCc6MG1BPRw KjsZmhqfqCwytotUnVg6gO1+ne3apqOhCoZG837CYNdvBHTfCGOLMUvkn8M7pQSJ3e/s3Y 7EETTjEKFVvaMG9s/PlM2sRzb0ydkYU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-350-18FuFe9iP5Cq84ecOvC9wA-1; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:54:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 18FuFe9iP5Cq84ecOvC9wA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1127A29AC012; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5223C2166B32; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20240428111640.27306-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> To: Paolo Abeni Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Alexander Duyck , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yunsheng Lin , Marc Dionne , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rxrpc: Fix using alignmask being zero for __page_frag_alloc_align() Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <261632.1714485291.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:54:51 +0100 Message-ID: <261633.1714485291@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6 Paolo Abeni wrote: > @David: I assume from your ack you are fine with this patch being > merged via the net tree, am I correct? Yes, the net tree is fine. David