Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: cs43130: Allow driver to work without IRQ connection

[Maciej Strozek <mstrozek@opensource.cirrus.com>]

W dniu 20/11/2023 o 14:40, Mark Brown pisze:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:17:34PM +0000, Maciej Strozek wrote:
>> +		if (to_poll == &cs43130->xtal_rdy) {
>> +			offset = 0;
>> +			flag = CS43130_XTAL_RDY_INT;
>> +		} else if (to_poll == &cs43130->pll_rdy) {
>> +			offset = 0;
>> +			flag = CS43130_PLL_RDY_INT;
>> +		} else if (to_poll == &cs43130->hpload_evt) {
>> +			offset = 3;
>> +			flag = CS43130_HPLOAD_NO_DC_INT | CS43130_HPLOAD_UNPLUG_INT |
>> +				CS43130_HPLOAD_OOR_INT | CS43130_HPLOAD_AC_INT |
>> +				CS43130_HPLOAD_DC_INT | CS43130_HPLOAD_ON_INT |
>> +				CS43130_HPLOAD_OFF_INT;
>> +		} else {
>> +			return 0;
>> +		}
> 
> Is it a bug to call this function without to_poll set to something
> known?  This will just silently ignore it which seems wrong and is
> inconsitent with the handling in the interrupt case which will wait for
> the the completion to be signalled and report a timeout on error.
> 

In interrupt case 0 means timeout (and calling function should expect 0 
as error/timeout), so the only inconsistency I see is in not waiting 
before returning a timeout, but that would be needlessly wasting time?
Do you think adding a debug print or a comment would help here?