From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mrpre@163.com,
syzbot+de6565462ab540f50e47@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] tcp: Correct signedness in skb remaining space calculation
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:44:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2627957.1751985886@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250707054112.101081-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> wrote:
> Syzkaller reported a bug [1] where sk->sk_forward_alloc can overflow.
>
> When we send data, if an skb exists at the tail of the write queue, the
> kernel will attempt to append the new data to that skb. However, the code
> that checks for available space in the skb is flawed:
> '''
> copy = size_goal - skb->len
> '''
>
> The types of the variables involved are:
> '''
> copy: ssize_t (s64 on 64-bit systems)
> size_goal: int
> skb->len: unsigned int
> '''
>
> Due to C's type promotion rules, the signed size_goal is converted to an
> unsigned int to match skb->len before the subtraction. The result is an
> unsigned int.
>
> When this unsigned int result is then assigned to the s64 copy variable,
> it is zero-extended, preserving its non-negative value. Consequently, copy
> is always >= 0.
>
> Assume we are sending 2GB of data and size_goal has been adjusted to a
> value smaller than skb->len. The subtraction will result in copy holding a
> very large positive integer. In the subsequent logic, this large value is
> used to update sk->sk_forward_alloc, which can easily cause it to overflow.
>
> The syzkaller reproducer uses TCP_REPAIR to reliably create this
> condition. However, this can also occur in real-world scenarios. The
> tcp_bound_to_half_wnd() function can also reduce size_goal to a small
> value. This would cause the subsequent tcp_wmem_schedule() to set
> sk->sk_forward_alloc to a value close to INT_MAX. Further memory
> allocation requests would then cause sk_forward_alloc to wrap around and
> become negative.
>
> [1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=de6565462ab540f50e47
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+de6565462ab540f50e47@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 270a1c3de47e ("tcp: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 5:41 Jiayuan Chen
2025-07-07 7:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-08 13:11 ` David Howells
2025-07-08 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-08 14:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-08 14:44 ` David Howells [this message]
2025-07-08 15:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2627957.1751985886@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+de6565462ab540f50e47@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®