Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope

[Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>]

On 10/8/24 15:18, Joseph Qi wrote:
> This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joseph

No problem.

-Heming

> 
> On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
>> Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
>> should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c  | 3 ++-
>>   fs/ocfs2/inode.c    | 5 +++--
>>   fs/ocfs2/resize.c   | 4 ++--
>>   fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
>>   4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
>>   	else
>>   		inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
>> ... ...