mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wen.yang@linux.dev
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: "Nam Cao" <namcao@linutronix.de>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Wen Yang" <wen.yang@linux.dev>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] rv/reactors: use context-sensitive lockdep wait type in rv_react()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 01:10:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26526e555baa5118325b2383e9f7f0f8f9b6a199.1786294920.git.wen.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1786294920.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>

From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>

Reactors must not explicitly take locks, so they should comply with
LD_WAIT_FREE.  However, reactor callbacks can run with preemption
enabled on any kernel (not just PREEMPT_RT).  If a timer interrupt
fires during the callback, the interrupt exit path schedules and
acquires rq->__lock (LD_WAIT_SPIN) while the lockdep override map that
declared LD_WAIT_FREE is still held, triggering a spurious
"Invalid wait context" warning:

    [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
    context-{5:5}
    1 lock held by kunit_try_catch/209:
     #0: (rv_react_map-wait-type-override){+.+.}-{1:1}
    kunit_try_catch/209 is trying to lock:
    ffff8a743ed3e8a0 (&rq->__lock){-...}-{2:2}

Fixes: 69d8895cb9a9 ("rv: Add explicit lockdep context for reactors")
Suggested-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
index 2f5fc8d18dea..5830229210e8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
@@ -465,18 +465,28 @@ int init_rv_reactors(struct dentry *root_dir)
 
 void rv_react(struct rv_monitor *monitor, const char *msg, ...)
 {
-	static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map, LD_WAIT_FREE);
+	/*
+	 * Reactors must not explicitly take locks, so they should be
+	 * LD_WAIT_FREE.  However, reactor callbacks can run with preemption
+	 * enabled, meaning the preempting code (e.g. the scheduler taking
+	 * rq->__lock at LD_WAIT_SPIN) may violate that constraint.  Use
+	 * LD_WAIT_SPIN in preemptible contexts to avoid false-positive lockdep
+	 * reports; keep LD_WAIT_FREE in NMI/hardirq where preemption is
+	 * disabled and the scheduler cannot run.
+	 */
+	static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map,        LD_WAIT_SPIN);
+	static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map_atomic, LD_WAIT_FREE);
+	struct lockdep_map * __maybe_unused map;
 	va_list args;
 
 	if (!rv_reacting_on() || !monitor->react)
 		return;
 
+	map = (in_nmi() || in_hardirq()) ? &rv_react_map_atomic : &rv_react_map;
 	va_start(args, msg);
-
-	lock_map_acquire_try(&rv_react_map);
+	lock_map_acquire_try(map);
 	monitor->react(msg, args);
-	lock_map_release(&rv_react_map);
-
+	lock_map_release(map);
 	va_end(args);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rv_react);
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-09 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-09 17:10 [PATCH v3 0/4] rv/reactors: fix lockdep warning and add KUnit tests wen.yang
2026-08-09 17:10 ` wen.yang [this message]
2026-08-12 12:34   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] rv/reactors: use context-sensitive lockdep wait type in rv_react() Gabriele Monaco
2026-08-17  8:18     ` Nam Cao
2026-08-09 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] rv/reactors: propagate rv_register_reactor() error from reactor init wen.yang
2026-08-17 10:54   ` Nam Cao
2026-08-09 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] rv/reactors: export rv_register_reactor() and rv_unregister_reactor() wen.yang
2026-08-09 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] rv/reactors: add KUnit tests for reactor registration and dispatch wen.yang
2026-08-12 12:58   ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-08-17 10:52   ` Nam Cao
2026-08-17 11:05     ` Gabriele Monaco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26526e555baa5118325b2383e9f7f0f8f9b6a199.1786294920.git.wen.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®