From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A49BC433F5 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235907AbiBMMO0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Feb 2022 07:14:26 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:36294 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232005AbiBMMOY (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Feb 2022 07:14:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572C85BD2A; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 04:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id i34so25391966lfv.2; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 04:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CIQtoCVcRD0g7BLfpN+rf0B4Y2cMxyH7CXJXhpt1HFE=; b=QIB2wMRjLkNRm9ii6WC9MIr2gRXkQUOTaSe7XOmw3Bicp8XEhXYkt61DhGGj/Y/uXO tvJlqDhkjasoyMza1I/hlfDYw3/u3V8IZm756fUEo9xborVwgSyVt2MorvhQSCIJKVzD DCFppnVDPvY0/nFLkQjxnzLsaJs31+dmv2rNknY/WvvzlCoC/OQ0mGW9jEH9JY9bIRyZ XgZSYkka7RHB+a518BOwX1X9bPc1R6eTTU96e+ac3VwnH5BoFYVPEnKtNi4CkIgxW5Ep BY3QMYyhoCzUdhX+1h5IW5wZRFrO/J82/cGS5mZfKllJ5oEqpM4ocnvr4OTZzIyRqnwO DO/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CIQtoCVcRD0g7BLfpN+rf0B4Y2cMxyH7CXJXhpt1HFE=; b=vGMxMxKSYkVcUhaKsLBGF1aaEss+gYKzZLd0pO44kj/Ye5dh3yM8hhpXXYjM4XGad8 b5gwA5IbQnCzXpj9lqf5I3/jvibke8SynBheuawzkO+y0bnykNmpsDWe8MGEdGu3GSNq Fy40lPIaUd8Eon57r5UjKQRxVZTwnBd9moV6Sta42zuF3DBr+3r5+eIo+7eAKV/ho4+S KePBykj0WJhe9/lipHMCipeVGMr0UTfjsSQnxZ2LDhz1P1peiZpn6l0rgPZSe3qyDMo6 9X6vbnjZv+m2bJNc3hGyF/db06d4+9P4o4ZLez3xxTbVO+oHh5yw+0lOD8K0BRObpVG+ ltgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531KzLO+t4UAAvqDfE55+CrSd9HzmddVtxEJIE9ivaDAdeZcUe/U t5DTRkrNtEplaSymNTnmA54= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/QCh5Oj/lkWkganevVGTUB7d6Bd2JWYH+NaneU4v4TyLNRTtz6m4VGW3kdM2wvBelVOM4sw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e25:: with SMTP id i37mr7413778lfv.325.1644754456857; Sun, 13 Feb 2022 04:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (109-252-138-165.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [109.252.138.165]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k17sm3698894ljo.70.2022.02.13.04.14.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Feb 2022 04:14:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2656099c-76bc-33a5-3b98-c46858025955@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:14:15 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: domains: Prevent power off for parent unless child is in deepest state Content-Language: en-US To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Alexandre Torgue , Geert Uytterhoeven , Rajendra Nayak , Dong Aisheng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220131113743.52265-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <400e45da-837a-c8ad-84b3-285e35f8462c@gmail.com> From: Dmitry Osipenko In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 07.02.2022 11:43, Ulf Hansson пишет: >> In general, such changes usually are deferred from being upstreamed >> until there is a real user, otherwise there is a risk of cluttering the >> code with unused features. Do you have a time estimation in regards to >> when STMicro may start to benefit from this change? > The STMicro folkz are working on it right now, but I can't give you > any estimates for their work. > > Moreover, I think the important point in this regard, is that the > $subject patch doesn't really hurt anything else, so then what's the > point of holding this back? If that work will never pan out, will you remove the unused code?