From: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mizhang@google.com, jmattson@google.com,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com, nikunj.dadhania@amd.com,
santosh.shukla@amd.com, manali.shukla@amd.com,
babu.moger@amd.com, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Set PerfMonV2 global control bits correctly
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:47:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <265a906f-6179-4ec4-b46d-491930b3d9ac@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZedUwKWW7PNkvUH1@google.com>
On 3/5/2024 10:52 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024, Like Xu wrote:
>> On 5/3/2024 3:46 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 1 +
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>>>>> index b6a7ad4d6914..14709c564d6a 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>>>>> @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>>>> if (pmu->version > 1) {
>>>>>>> pmu->global_ctrl_mask = ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
>>>>>>> pmu->global_status_mask = pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
>>>>>>> + pmu->global_ctrl = ~pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
>>>>
>>>> It seems to be more easily understand to calculate global_ctrl firstly and
>>>> then derive the globol_ctrl_mask (negative logic).
>>>
>>> Hrm, I'm torn. On one hand, awful name aside (global_ctrl_mask should really be
>>> something like global_ctrl_rsvd_bits), the computation of the reserved bits should
>>> come from the capabilities of the PMU, not from the RESET value.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, setting _all_ non-reserved bits will likely do the wrong thing
>>> if AMD ever adds bits in PerfCntGlobalCtl that aren't tied to general purpose
>>> counters. But, that's a future theoretical problem, so I'm inclined to vote for
>>> Sandipan's approach.
>>
>> I suspect that Intel hardware also has this behaviour [*] although guest
>> kernels using Intel pmu version 1 are pretty much non-existent.
>>
>> [*] Table 10-1. IA-32 and Intel® 64 Processor States Following Power-up,
>> Reset, or INIT (Contd.)
>
> Aha! Nice. To save people lookups, the table says:
>
> IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL: Sets bits n-1:0 and clears the upper bits.
>
> and
>
> Where "n" is the number of general-purpose counters available in the processor.
>
> Which means that (a) KVM can handle this in common code and (b) we can dodge the
> whole reserved bits chicken-and-egg problem since global_ctrl *can't* be derived
> from global_ctrl_mask.
>
> This? (compile tested only)
>
> ---
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:02:26 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Set enable bits for GP counters in
> PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL at "RESET"
>
> Set the enable bits for general purpose counters in IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL
> when refreshing the PMU to emulate the MSR's architecturally defined
> post-RESET behavior. Per Intel's SDM:
>
> IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL: Sets bits n-1:0 and clears the upper bits.
>
> and
>
> Where "n" is the number of general-purpose counters available in the processor.
>
> This is a long-standing bug that was recently exposed when KVM added
> supported for AMD's PerfMonV2, i.e. when KVM started exposing a vPMU with
> PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL to guest software that only knew how to program v1 PMUs
> (that don't support PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL). Failure to emulate the post-RESET
> behavior results in such guests unknowingly leaving all general purpose
> counters globally disabled (the entire reason the post-RESET value sets
> the GP counter enable bits is to maintain backwards compatibility).
>
> The bug has likely gone unnoticed because PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL has been
> supported on Intel CPUs for as long as KVM has existed, i.e. hardly anyone
> is running guest software that isn't aware of PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL on Intel
> PMUs.
>
> Note, kvm_pmu_refresh() can be invoked multiple times, i.e. it's not a
> "pure" RESET flow. But it can only be called prior to the first KVM_RUN,
> i.e. the guest will only ever observe the final value.
>
> Reported-by: Reported-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
> Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 87cc6c8809ad..f61ce26aeb90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -741,6 +741,8 @@ static void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> if (KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_vcpu_has_run(vcpu), vcpu->kvm))
> return;
>
> @@ -750,8 +752,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
>
> - bitmap_zero(vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->all_valid_pmc_idx, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
> + bitmap_zero(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
> static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_refresh)(vcpu);
> +
> + /*
> + * At RESET, both Intel and AMD CPUs set all enable bits for general
> + * purpose counters in IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL (so that software that
> + * was written for v1 PMUs don't unknowingly leave GP counters disabled
> + * in the global controls). Emulate that behavior when refreshing the
> + * PMU so that userspace doesn't need to manually set PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL.
> + */
> + if (kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(pmu))
> + pmu->global_ctrl = GENMASK_ULL(pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters - 1, 0);
> }
>
> void kvm_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> base-commit: 1d7ae977d219e68698fdb9bed1049dc561038aa1
Thanks. This looks good.
Tested-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 7:50 Sandipan Das
2024-03-01 8:37 ` Like Xu
2024-03-01 9:00 ` Sandipan Das
2024-03-04 7:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-04 19:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-04 20:17 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-05 2:31 ` Like Xu
2024-03-05 17:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-05 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-05 18:31 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-03-06 2:32 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-06 3:23 ` Like Xu
2024-03-06 5:17 ` Sandipan Das [this message]
2024-03-06 2:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-04 20:06 ` Mingwei Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=265a906f-6179-4ec4-b46d-491930b3d9ac@amd.com \
--to=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®