Re: [PATCH v2 -next] platform: surface: fix non-PM_SLEEP build warnings

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 12/15/20 11:55 AM, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On 12/15/20 12:33 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Fix build warnings when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled and these
>> functions are not used:
>>
>> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:189:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>   static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)
>>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:184:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>   static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Fixes: 274335f1c557 ("platform/surface: Add Driver to set up lid GPEs on MS Surface device")
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> v2: dropped Maximilian's RVB tag since the patch changed
>>      use preferred __maybe_unused instead of ifdeffery:
>>        https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732981/
>>
>>   drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c |    4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux-next-20201214.orig/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
>> +++ linux-next-20201214/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
>> @@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ static int surface_lid_enable_wakeup(str
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   -static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +static int __maybe_unused surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>       return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, true);
>>   }
>>   -static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +static int __maybe_unused surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>       return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, false);
>>   }
>>
> 
> Code looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
> 
> As already mentioned before, I'd prefer the subject line to be
> "platform/surface: gpe: ...", or at least "platform/surface: ..." for
> consistency with other commits. May just be a personal preference
> though, so nothing that should prevent it from being applied.
> 

Ugh, sorry about that. I've changed that in the patch so if I ever
resend it, it will be fixed.


-- 
~Randy