From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:00:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:00:39 -0500 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:25421 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:00:25 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Torrey Hoffman cc: Matthew Pitts , Jacob Anawalt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Knowing what options a kernel was compiled with In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:41:31 -0800." <4461B4112BDB2A4FB5635DE1995874320223F3@mail0.myrio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:00:16 +1100 Message-ID: <26703.980816416@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:41:31 -0800, Torrey Hoffman wrote: >Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as >part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the >official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution >maintainers do the same. Not until FHS decide what that standard location is. An entry in FHS will carry far more weight with distributors than a kernel Makefile patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/