mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] cpuidle: record the overhead of idle entry
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 02:35:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2672521.fEEa1b19Vu@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506756034-6340-3-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com>

On Saturday, September 30, 2017 9:20:28 AM CEST Aubrey Li wrote:
> Record the overhead of idle entry in micro-second
> 

What is this needed for?

> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpuidle.h   | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/idle.c       |  8 +++++++-
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 60bb64f..4066308 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -302,6 +302,39 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>  		cpuidle_curr_governor->reflect(dev, index);
>  }
>  
> +/* cpuidle_entry_start - record idle entry start */

A proper kerneldoc, please.

> +void cpuidle_entry_start(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev = cpuidle_get_device();
> +
> +	if (dev)
> +		dev->idle_stat.entry_start = local_clock();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * cpuidle_entry_end - record idle entry end, and maintain
> + * the entry overhead average in micro-second
> + */

A proper kerneldoc, please.

> +void cpuidle_entry_end(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev = cpuidle_get_device();
> +	u64 overhead;
> +	s64 diff;
> +
> +	if (dev) {
> +		dev->idle_stat.entry_end = local_clock();
> +		overhead = div_u64(dev->idle_stat.entry_end -
> +				dev->idle_stat.entry_start, NSEC_PER_USEC);

Is the conversion really necessary?

If so, then why?

And if there is a good reason, what about using right shift to do
an approximate conversion to avoid the extra division here?

> +		diff = overhead - dev->idle_stat.overhead;
> +		dev->idle_stat.overhead += diff >> 3;

Can you please explain what happens in the two lines above?

> +		/*
> +		 * limit overhead to 1us
> +		 */
> +		if (dev->idle_stat.overhead == 0)
> +			dev->idle_stat.overhead = 1;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpuidle_install_idle_handler - installs the cpuidle idle loop handler
>   */
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> index fc1e5d7..cad9b71 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,15 @@ struct cpuidle_device_kobj;
>  struct cpuidle_state_kobj;
>  struct cpuidle_driver_kobj;
>  
> +struct cpuidle_stat {
> +	u64			entry_start;	/* nanosecond */
> +	u64			entry_end;	/* nanosecond */
> +	u64			overhead;	/* nanosecond */
> +	unsigned int		predicted_us;	/* microsecond */
> +	bool			predicted;	/* ever predicted? */
> +	bool			fast_idle;	/* fast idle? */

Some of the fields here are never used in the code after this patch.

Also it would be good to add a comment describing the meaning of the
fields.

> +};
> +
>  struct cpuidle_device {
>  	unsigned int		registered:1;
>  	unsigned int		enabled:1;
> @@ -89,6 +98,7 @@ struct cpuidle_device {
>  	cpumask_t		coupled_cpus;
>  	struct cpuidle_coupled	*coupled;
>  #endif
> +	struct cpuidle_stat	idle_stat;
>  };
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, cpuidle_devices);
> @@ -131,6 +141,8 @@ extern bool cpuidle_not_available(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  
>  extern int cpuidle_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  			  struct cpuidle_device *dev);
> +extern void cpuidle_entry_start(void);
> +extern void cpuidle_entry_end(void);
>  extern int cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  			 struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index);
>  extern void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index);
> @@ -164,6 +176,8 @@ static inline bool cpuidle_not_available(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  static inline int cpuidle_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  				 struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>  {return -ENODEV; }
> +static inline void cpuidle_entry_start(void) { }
> +static inline void cpuidle_entry_end(void) { }
>  static inline int cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>  				struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>  {return -ENODEV; }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index 6c23e30..0951dac 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
>  static void do_idle(void)
>  {
>  	/*
> +	 * we record idle entry overhead now, so any deferrable items
> +	 * in idle entry path need to be placed between cpuidle_entry_start()
> +	 * and cpuidle_entry_end()
> +	 */
> +	cpuidle_entry_start();
> +	/*
>  	 * If the arch has a polling bit, we maintain an invariant:
>  	 *
>  	 * Our polling bit is clear if we're not scheduled (i.e. if rq->curr !=
> @@ -217,10 +223,10 @@ static void do_idle(void)
>  	 * then setting need_resched is guaranteed to cause the CPU to
>  	 * reschedule.
>  	 */
> -
>  	__current_set_polling();
>  	quiet_vmstat();
>  	tick_nohz_idle_enter();
> +	cpuidle_entry_end();
>  
>  	while (!need_resched()) {
>  		check_pgt_cache();
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-14  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-30  7:20 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Introduct cpu idle prediction functionality Aubrey Li
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] cpuidle: menu: extract " Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  2:46     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] cpuidle: record the overhead of idle entry Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-10-16  3:11     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-17  0:05       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-17  7:04         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] cpuidle: add a new predict interface Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  8:04     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-14  1:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  9:52     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] tick/nohz: keep tick on for a fast idle Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  3:26     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-16  4:45       ` Mike Galbraith
2017-10-16  5:34         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-16  6:25           ` Mike Galbraith
2017-10-16  6:31             ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] timers: keep sleep length updated as needed Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  6:46     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-16 23:58       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-17  6:10         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] cpuidle: make fast idle threshold tunable Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  0:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  6:00     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-17  0:01       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-17  6:12         ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] cpuidle: introduce irq timing to make idle prediction Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  1:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  6:03     ` Li, Aubrey
2017-09-30  7:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] cpuidle: introduce run queue average idle " Aubrey Li
2017-10-14  1:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-14  1:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] Introduct cpu idle prediction functionality Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-16  7:44   ` Li, Aubrey
2017-10-17  0:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-17  7:32       ` Li, Aubrey
2017-11-30  1:00 ` Li, Aubrey
2017-11-30  1:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2672521.fEEa1b19Vu@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®