From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix lockdep warning in global_clock()
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:16:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2674af740912212216mb75ef54l5143576b8173acff@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B305680.4090304@cn.fujitsu.com>
[snip]
>> The problem isn't with locks, it's with disabling interrupts. Lockdep
>> keeps track of every time interrupts are disabled. If something disables
>> interrupts with raw_* but then calls something that disables interrupts
>> the normal way, lockdep will detect that interrupts are being disabled
>> but they already are disabled. The internal irq disabled variable in
>> lockdep wont match reality, and this will blow up (well, disable
>> lockdep).
>>
>> So if cpu_clock disables interrupts with local_irq_* then so must
>> trace_clock_global.
>>
>
> Looking into sched_clock.c, seems the only place that can trigger lockdep
> is the local_irq_* in cpu_clock(), though I'm not sure for architecture-
> specific sched_clock().
>
> If so, I think we can use raw_local_irq_* in cpu_clock(). Actually I
> tried it and the warning is gone.
>
I think the reason is on local_irq_restore():
#define local_irq_restore(flags) \
do { \
typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
if (raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) { \
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
trace_hardirqs_off(); \ <======
} else { \
trace_hardirqs_on(); \
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
} \
} while (0)
If we have a call trace like below:
raw_local_irq_save();
...
local_irq_save();
...
local_irq_restore();
...
raw_locla_irq_save();
Then when we leave from local_irq_restore(), current->hardirqs_enabled will
changed by trace_hardirqs_off() to 0, this will break the all consistent.
Thanks,
Yong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 6:27 Li Zefan
2009-12-21 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-21 7:36 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-21 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-21 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-22 5:17 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-22 6:16 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2009-12-22 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 0:59 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-21 15:49 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2674af740912212216mb75ef54l5143576b8173acff@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®