From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
To: CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY <ccsr007@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"arun85.m@gmail.com" <arun85.m@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] v5.15: UDP packets not fragmented after receiving ICMP "Fragmentation Needed" (works in v5.10)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:39:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26786cc6-79cf-4f6c-a217-d1358aacfcc0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHD5p1U5vrrcT1QpqPDwEgQJANdX67N-j0Hy4sh2ED+6BPMstQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chandra Sekhar,
From a stable kernels point of view I have some comments.
On 18/09/25 08:54, CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We are observing an intermittent regression in UDP fragmentation
> handling between Linux kernel versions v5.10.35 and v5.15.71.
>
These both are like really old stable kernels. Can you try with the
latest stable kernels ?
5.15.193 and 5.10.244 ?
If you could reproduce the same on 5.15.193, maybe we should try on
different kernels to understand the cause better (i.e 5.15.0 and then
narrow it if needed)
> Problem description:
> Our application sends UDP packets that exceed the path MTU. An
> intermediate hop returns an ICMP Type 3, Code 4 (Fragmentation Needed)
> message.
>
> On v5.10.35, the kernel correctly updates the Path MTU cache, and
> subsequent packets are fragmented as expected.
>
> On v5.15.71, although the ICMP message is received by the kernel,
> subsequent UDP packets are sometimes not fragmented and continue to be
> dropped.
>
> System details:
>
> Egress interface MTU: 9192 bytes
>
> Path MTU at intermediate hop: 1500 bytes
>
> Kernel parameter: ip_no_pmtu_disc=0 (default)
>
> Questions / request for feedback:
>
> Is this a known regression in the 5.15 kernel series?
>
> We have verified that the Path MTU cache is usually updated correctly.
>
> Is there a way to detect or log cases where the cache is not updated?
>
> If this issue has already been addressed, could you please point us to
> the relevant fix commit so we can backport and test it?
>
> We have reviewed several patches between v5.10.35 and v5.15.71 related
> to PMTU and ICMP handling and examined the code flow,
> but have not been able to pinpoint the root cause.
>
> Any guidance, insights, or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
>
Thanks,
Harshit
> Best regards,
> Chandrasekharreddy C
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 3:24 CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY
2025-09-18 5:09 ` Harshit Mogalapalli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26786cc6-79cf-4f6c-a217-d1358aacfcc0@oracle.com \
--to=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=arun85.m@gmail.com \
--cc=ccsr007@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®