From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752873AbdHQPqr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:46:47 -0400
Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64737 "EHLO
        cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751561AbdHQPqp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:46:45 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't send callback pointer to cpufreq_add_update_util_hook()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 17:31:38 +0200
Message-ID: <2692371.TLU4a4PDeX@aspire.rjw.lan>
In-Reply-To: <fb914a5aef386f7c3ae6ea5ed53e1fc299f47869.1502971486.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
References: <fb914a5aef386f7c3ae6ea5ed53e1fc299f47869.1502971486.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
> better if the callers fill it themselves, as they can do it from the
> governor->init() callback then, which is called only once per policy
> lifetime rather than doing it from governor->start which can get called
> multiple times.

So what problem exactly is this addressing?

Thanks,
Rafael