From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752586AbdB1N2r (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:28:47 -0500
Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:42208 "EHLO
        cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752460AbdB1N2l (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:28:41 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Two fixes related to limis
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:13:30 +0100
Message-ID: <2694426.SgxlQuL17D@aspire.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Both fix some utter confusion in the sysfs interface.

The first one makes intel_pstate_update_policies() end up with limits set to
the same value that it was set to initially.

The second one avoids reinitializing limits in intel_pstate_set_policy() when
the moon phase is right and the wind blows from a specific direction.

Thanks,
Rafael