From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738AbcFOWAu (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:00:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34099 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751921AbcFOWAs (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:00:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" To: Cornelia Huck References: <1465824332-10628-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20160613164421.77b70bee.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <26948b73-1233-8515-24ac-7557837230b2@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160613164421.77b70bee.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++----- >> > arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - >> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++-------- >> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------ >> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- >> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- >> > 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >> > > Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :) So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next? Thanks, Paolo