From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6F3657BC for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706536905; cv=none; b=TGiEfKgbKNw2mRIqKYobzshVhX056Mj5YVgzNr0QOrJv0QOsMRKTGB+WN2PxyucOJpvFBK7kZFzEy/0Gs8t8ma2csMYORnpw4WnL/B1BfVbff2fUdH6A5hnnN77RcsMtzFnvaZ40D3ayNLPsqfA7IeIPlO4pdpmiNjBSctPw0sw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706536905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X0W6Vdc4XGL8Mpvl/v2+8V8iaZ/DRH0HP9McF9MpY1o=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=X/pSu45rA5RrgCBdJ1lZAzeYjfr/jfr9vHvZFcZ7UcAj8mXGxleYo2Ulw8erbY+r8ARx18+0TH6uRXQVCWfcIzbe0dL2o9C65fO7XT7styWRP1eCaHm7fvHnpTiXmm3Fk+pUbGXcIv2Osd0jBaiFk1vuVKrMMDEvxuYBn6VuVLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=okPEExIF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="okPEExIF" Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40eb033c1b0so34642705e9.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1706536902; x=1707141702; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X0W6Vdc4XGL8Mpvl/v2+8V8iaZ/DRH0HP9McF9MpY1o=; b=okPEExIFeuauTjBZnzhCColCwXBk9wxhyB3E86hB6XPtF1WDANRFPr9a9uno+YfUvw WJCA5WHn0GHVzI2sir9LSzIKBUyuv8EQgsggFj1TPB46uXFqSNIqE1ZLGQ685I3ywWF+ zXKRiK0C13XZ8eh+nEsjlfFKvi0pI5Bx9rt4N0YxDLivRWCdY3N5BI6z2trw4DdOM5xy rur05mfYS9r7bCpNFkYiBfDabUH7hcllMfCwsCn1QMTUrZKvMmkxuVgHgUB0FTS2De6z K1p3m27E4jGNDJwJzmy13YCQ/cA7Caz/JW4s1uKaM4jnnns1SyxgGBKPPJaW1eLhee2R q9+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706536902; x=1707141702; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X0W6Vdc4XGL8Mpvl/v2+8V8iaZ/DRH0HP9McF9MpY1o=; b=mjcx77/Fcv6cJlOCKrBQ1GdH9vP8Zh1rTF3oxJ4qfyN34cqzvQQB0rkJ0t33n1OiBA bRO+VPmPLknqqWgCSV2wFPoIQlTGHC6GhJpvs9odgSVNm4xhMUfvfJbDnVDnZ16kQYxy P6AMRwjKf0jwFnZQuxAZoLq1n6b75GUuwy4rI6r6CHh+Z4cYxZ1JO6nIwIkdsJVv9Ae0 amyjzFIMYVn42ZYnzbD+Mo7kJGVGdahHOX2dUqmKkn8eyrHrUwQzsglFgHF6cfizlI39 mXKC9wJg14VZtbjdbrm/jeabG/6jmJ/yV9j1JnoE0uiuPxJqbUY/y/QADNS3jolqWYXa 2jxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwlCGMLH4t4AU3hXz10ShKQnLywij3VsQbBowkZQfR5FLCbJVci SyaBxLuz/0ObKPuueO+J/xytmVEET4O5/2atoViO5SELZS0bqT8q4YjMSP2y/Yc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwd8dICvXLoBYzRn3PDAeKNYTy4XOOjfsXrUdMQ4SFRmeoN09BYrGBQxGREV1nMzxqYquADQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe83:0:b0:33a:eb24:8383 with SMTP id l3-20020adffe83000000b0033aeb248383mr2513122wrr.13.1706536902158; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from draszik.lan ([80.111.64.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6-20020adfca86000000b0033aed7423e8sm2916734wrh.11.2024.01.29.06.01.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:01:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26ba94b4febb605662913455618896ce4281645c.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: use correct clocks for usi8 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Sam Protsenko Cc: peter.griffin@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, willmcvicker@google.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:01:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20240127003607.501086-1-andre.draszik@linaro.org> <20240127003607.501086-4-andre.draszik@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1-1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Sam, On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 21:22 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote: > From [1] it looks like DIV_CLK_PERIC0_USI8_USI is a common parrent for > these two leaf gate clocks: > =C2=A0 1. GOUT_BLK_PERIC0_UID_RSTNSYNC_CLK_PERIC0_USI8_USI_IPCLKPORT_CLK > =C2=A0 2. GOUT_BLK_PERIC0_UID_PERIC0_TOP0_IPCLKPORT_IPCLK_7 >=20 > So IIUC, you replace clock #1 with clock #2 in this patch? If so, I > think that's a right move, because in my experience RSTNSYNC clocks That is correct. Cheers, Andre'