mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mike D. Day" <ncmike@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.6-xen] sysfs attributes for xen
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:53:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26c21a6abef89d4629a0da08bc0ba9bf@cl.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138642737.22903.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>


On 30 Jan 2006, at 17:38, Dave Hansen wrote:

> Yes, they are.  Buuuuuuut, you _can_ make the code around them a little
> less evil.  If you _must_ use a typedef, you could do something like
> this:
>
> #define XEN_CAP_INFO_LEN_BYTES 1024
> typedef char [XEN_CAP_INFO_LEN_BYTES] xen_capabilities_info_t;

Is that really better than just referencing the typedef? I've always 
considered them okay for simple scalar and array types, even if they 
are to be avoided for structure types. Is it the size aspect that is 
the problem (e.g., a typedef'ed type should be okay to allocate on the 
stack)?

  -- Keir


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-30 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-28  2:20 Mike D. Day
2006-01-28  2:25 ` Greg KH
2006-01-28  2:38 ` Greg KH
2006-01-28 12:23   ` Vincent Hanquez
2006-01-28  3:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2006-01-30 16:18 ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-30 16:58   ` [Xen-devel] " Mike D. Day
2006-01-30 17:04     ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-30 17:17       ` Mike D. Day
2006-01-30 17:26         ` Greg KH
2006-01-30 17:38         ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-30 17:53           ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2006-01-30 17:56             ` Dave Hansen
2006-01-30 19:33             ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26c21a6abef89d4629a0da08bc0ba9bf@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=keir.fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®