From: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Matt Eaton <linux@divinehawk.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: xhci: add xhci-no-soft-retry-quirk
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 23:20:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26da98ca-8074-4116-a1cb-291f306f55bf@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUBpLfH+bi3Q5hD+WWG0QnyCfmQMRt9TkUN+zC1pvH44ez90w@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/28/2026 9:37 PM, Matt Eaton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 3:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/08/2026 15:18, Matt Eaton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 2:39 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 28/08/2026 14:37, Matt Eaton via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>>> From: Matt Eaton <linux@divinehawk.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Document the xhci-no-soft-retry-quirk property, added in the
>>>>> following patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> snps,dwc3-common.yaml refs usb-xhci.yaml for every dr_mode other than
>>>>> peripheral, so a host-mode dwc3 node inherits it and dt_binding_check
>>>>> accepts it there.
>>>>
>>>> I do not understand how this sentence is relevant. Please describe the
>>>> hardware needing this.
>>>
>>> I came across this while porting the UniFi Travel Router (IPQ4018),
>>> the stock Qualcomm kernel is 4.4.60 which predates the soft retry
>>> code. The command ring hangs if you disconnect the device while it's
>>> transmitting. Reproducible consistently when using USB to tether to a
>>> phone.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matt Eaton <linux@divinehawk.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
>>>>> index 4238ae896ef6..5d67a41658f7 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ properties:
>>>>> description: Set if the controller has broken port disable mechanism
>>>>> type: boolean
>>>>>
>>>>> + xhci-no-soft-retry-quirk:
>>>>> + description: Set if the controller cannot perform xHCI Soft Retry correctly
>>>>
>>>> Why isn't this implied by compatible? Looks like controller's property.
>>>
>>> The xhci device is created by dwc3 core as a child device, and so
>>> xhci_plat_probe() is used. I think a DT property is the right
>>> approach, similar to quirk-broken-port-ped, but to set
>>> XHCI_NO_SOFT_RETRY.
>>
>> Linux driver behavior should not matter here. DT property for telling
>> Linux what to do is not the right approach. As I said, it's implied by
>> compatible unless you bring hardware reasons why it is not. Driver
>> reasons don't matter.
>
> Will rework without DT property. Appreciate the feedback!
>
If you have any upstream QC target that needs this, you can use the
following patch as reference:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260723-dwc3-skip-init-quirk-v1-1-97682bb44ebd@oss.qualcomm.com/
Regards,
Krishna,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 12:37 [PATCH 0/2] " Matt Eaton via B4 Relay
2026-08-28 12:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: " Matt Eaton via B4 Relay
2026-08-28 12:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-28 13:18 ` Matt Eaton
2026-08-28 13:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-28 16:07 ` Matt Eaton
2026-08-28 17:50 ` Krishna Kurapati [this message]
2026-08-28 12:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: xhci-plat: add xhci-no-soft-retry-quirk device property Matt Eaton via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26da98ca-8074-4116-a1cb-291f306f55bf@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@divinehawk.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®