From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756814Ab2I1IAm (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:00:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13251 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619Ab2I1IAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:00:41 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <5555.1348531649@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <87ehlp30pd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rusty Russell , herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, pjones@redhat.com, jwboyer@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:00:27 +0100 Message-ID: <27146.1348819227@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Just wondering, what's the advantage of doing panic over just > rejecting the module? > Panic is a DoS? FIPS mode is strange like that. David