mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lpechacek@suse.cz
To: "Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Libor Pechacek" <lpechacek@suse.cz>,
	bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Fix sysfs attribute handling
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:05:05 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27198.10.20.10.50.1206302705.squirrel@webmail.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18749.1206234754@death>

> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:52:55 +0100 Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> bonding: Fix sysfs attribute handling
>>>
>>> For bonding interfaces any attempt to read the sysfs directory contents
>>> after
>>> module removal results in an oops.  The fix is to release sysfs
>>> attributes
>>> for the interfaces upon module unload.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>
>>> --
>>>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    3 +--
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> index 0942d82..33767d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> @@ -4528,8 +4528,7 @@ static void bond_free_all(void)
>>>  		netif_tx_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
>>>  		/* Release the bonded slaves */
>>>  		bond_release_all(bond_dev);
>>> -		bond_deinit(bond_dev);
>>> -		unregister_netdevice(bond_dev);
>>> +		bond_destroy(bond);
>>>  	}
>>
>>Is this also needed in 2.6.24.x?
>
> 	Yes (I haven't tested it personally, but the affected code is
> the same).  I was going to forward this to stable when it was accepted
> upstream.  The oops is fairly straightforward to create:
>
> # modprobe bonding
> # cd /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding
> # rmmod bonding
> # ls

Yes, exactly.

I tested the patch with the latest Linus' tree (GIT commit
49a5ba46c5d1e34bcb07634157b29d7414ce13bd), but I first found the bug in
2.6.16.

Libor


      reply	other threads:[~2008-03-23 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-21 13:52 Libor Pechacek
2008-03-23  0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-23  1:12   ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-03-23 20:05     ` lpechacek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27198.10.20.10.50.1206302705.squirrel@webmail.suse.cz \
    --to=lpechacek@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®