mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] firmware loader: Fix the race FW_STATUS_DONE is followed by class_timeout
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 02:07:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A1BFAE8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMKtkp3xna6C-G04sUqOm+7H4FEN-UZjyVQUfdfCPPBnw@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei@canonical.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:02 AM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] firmware loader: Fix the race FW_STATUS_DONE is
> followed by class_timeout
> 
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > There is a race as below when calling request_firmware():
> > CPU1                                   CPU2
> > write 0 > loading
> > mutex_lock(&fw_lock)
> > ...
> > set_bit FW_STATUS_DONE                 class_timeout is coming
> >                                        set_bit FW_STATUS_ABORT
> > complete_all &completion
> > ...
> > mutex_unlock(&fw_lock)
> >
> > In this time, the bit FW_STATUS_DONE and FW_STATUS_ABORT are set,
> > and request_firmware() will return failure due to condition in
> > _request_firmware_load():
> >         if (!buf->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status))
> >                 retval = -ENOENT;
> >
> > But from the above scenerio, it should be a successful requesting.
> > So we need judge if the bit FW_STATUS_DONE is already set before
> > calling fw_load_abort() in timeout function.
> >
> > As Ming's proposal, we need change the timer into sched_work to
> > benefit from using &fw_lock mutex also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/firmware_class.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index 8945f4e..f2caa0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ struct fw_cache_entry {
> >  };
> >
> >  struct firmware_priv {
> > -       struct timer_list timeout;
> > +       struct delayed_work timeout_work;
> >         bool nowait;
> >         struct device dev;
> >         struct firmware_buf *buf;
> > @@ -667,10 +667,17 @@ static struct bin_attribute firmware_attr_data = {
> >         .write = firmware_data_write,
> >  };
> >
> > -static void firmware_class_timeout(u_long data)
> > +static void firmware_class_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> > -       struct firmware_priv *fw_priv = (struct firmware_priv *) data;
> > +       struct firmware_priv *fw_priv = container_of(work,
> > +                       struct firmware_priv, timeout_work.work);
> >
> > +       mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > +       if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &(fw_priv->buf->status))) {
> > +               mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > +               return;
> > +       }
> > +       mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> >         fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
> 
> fw_lock should be held when fw_load_abort(fw_priv) is running.
OK.

> 
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -690,8 +697,8 @@ fw_create_instance(struct firmware *firmware,
> const char *fw_name,
> >
> >         fw_priv->nowait = nowait;
> >         fw_priv->fw = firmware;
> > -       setup_timer(&fw_priv->timeout,
> > -                   firmware_class_timeout, (u_long) fw_priv);
> > +       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fw_priv->timeout_work,
> > +               firmware_class_timeout_work);
> >
> >         f_dev = &fw_priv->dev;
> >
> > @@ -858,7 +865,9 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct
> firmware_priv *fw_priv, bool uevent,
> >                 dev_dbg(f_dev->parent, "firmware: direct-loading"
> >                         " firmware %s\n", buf->fw_id);
> >
> > +               mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> >                 set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status);
> > +               mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> >                 complete_all(&buf->completion);
> >                 direct_load = 1;
> >                 goto handle_fw;
> > @@ -894,15 +903,15 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct
> firmware_priv *fw_priv, bool uevent,
> >                 dev_set_uevent_suppress(f_dev, false);
> >                 dev_dbg(f_dev, "firmware: requesting %s\n",
> buf->fw_id);
> >                 if (timeout != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
> > -                       mod_timer(&fw_priv->timeout,
> > -                                 round_jiffies_up(jiffies + timeout));
> > +
> schedule_delayed_work(&fw_priv->timeout_work,
> > +                                       timeout * HZ);
> 
> timeout is in unit of jiffies already, so multiplying by 'HZ' isn't needed.
Oh, sorry for that, I just tested it in one old version.
Will update the patch soon.

> 
> >
> >                 kobject_uevent(&fw_priv->dev.kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
> >         }
> >
> >         wait_for_completion(&buf->completion);
> >
> > -       del_timer_sync(&fw_priv->timeout);
> > +       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&fw_priv->timeout_work);
> >
> >  handle_fw:
> >         mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Ming Lei

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-07 16:45 [PATCH] " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-07 10:39 ` Ming Lei
2012-11-08  1:31   ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-11-08 10:29 ` [PATCH V2] " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-08  2:01   ` Ming Lei
2012-11-08  2:07     ` Liu, Chuansheng [this message]
2012-11-08 11:14 ` [PATCH V3] " Chuansheng Liu
2012-11-08  9:57   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A1BFAE8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®