mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Fix the twice judgement in rpm_suspend/resume()
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:20:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A20400F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1301141027290.1782-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@rowland.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:30 PM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: Liu, Chuansheng; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Runtime: Fix the twice judgement in
> rpm_suspend/resume()
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 01:48:18 AM Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > In function rpm_suspend/resume(), when going into the for(;;),
> > > the pre-condition judgement has been done, and the variable
> runtime_status
> > > are always protected by &power.lock, so it is not necessary to judge
> > > them again before unlock_irq &power.lock in for(;;).
> > >
> > > This patch clean them up.
> >
> > Well, I don't really think this fixes anything.  Yes, we may save one check
> > here and there, but the current code follows the wait_event() convention.
OK, thanks.

> 
> Indeed, this patch introduces a race.  If runtime_status changes from
> RPM_SUSPENDING and power.wait_queue is signalled in between the test at
> the end of the loop and the prepare_to_wait() call, the loop will never
> end.
Checking the race case, it should not happen?
Updating runtime_status and wake_up wait_queue are protected by power.lock.
spin_lock(&power.lock)
...
__update_runtime_status()
...
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue)
...
spin_unlock(&power.lock)


> 
> Alan Stern
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> >
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   18 +++++++++---------
> > >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > index 3148b10..32d6497 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > @@ -377,14 +377,14 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int
> rpmflags)
> > >  		for (;;) {
> > >  			prepare_to_wait(&dev->power.wait_queue, &wait,
> > >  					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > -			if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
> > > -				break;
> > >
> > >  			spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> > >
> > >  			schedule();
> > >
> > >  			spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> > > +			if (dev->power.runtime_status != RPM_SUSPENDING)
> > > +				break;
> > >  		}


  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-15  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 17:48 Chuansheng Liu
2013-01-14 12:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 15:30   ` Alan Stern
2013-01-15  1:20     ` Liu, Chuansheng [this message]
2013-01-15 15:50       ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A20400F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®