From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Derek John Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
"Joaquín Ignacio Aramendía" <samsagax@gmail.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
Eileen <eileen@one-netbook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] platform/x86: oxpec: Fix Apex charge limit control
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 20:56:47 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <272b2d3c-243a-cfb8-bf34-c6cffc7e5fec@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920190438.3444923-1-lkml@antheas.dev>
On Sun, 20 Sep 2026, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> The OneXPlayer Apex uses E5/E6 for battery bypass / charge limit, making
> it the first device to deviate. This was verified by a user on Windows
> with BIOS version 2.17 and later by running this kernel patch.
>
> Drop X1_ from the MASK variables as they are common in all devices,
> introduce a board enum for Apex, and make it use the new E5/E6 registers
> for charge limit / bypass. Apply the same quirks as oxp_fly, since APEX
> uses the same registers otherwise.
>
> Fixes: 3385ea97c14d ("platform/x86: oxpec: Add support for OneXPlayer APEX")
> Signed-off-by: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/oxpec.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/oxpec.c b/drivers/platform/x86/oxpec.c
> index 34bb17fca148..38c272995437 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/oxpec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/oxpec.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ enum oxp_board {
> oxp_x1,
> oxp_g1_i,
> oxp_g1_a,
> + oxp_apex,
> };
>
> static enum oxp_board board;
> @@ -93,11 +94,14 @@ static struct device *oxp_dev;
> #define OXP_X1_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG 0xA3 /* X1 charge limit (%) */
> #define OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG 0xA4 /* X1 bypass charging */
>
> -#define OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE 0x01
> +#define OXP_APEX_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG 0xE5 /* Apex charge limit (%) */
> +#define OXP_APEX_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG 0xE6 /* Apex bypass charging */
> +
> +#define OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE 0x01
> /* X1 Mask is 0x0A, F1Pro is 0x02 but the extra bit on the X1 does nothing. */
> -#define OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_OFF 0x02
> -#define OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS (OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE | \
> - OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_OFF)
> +#define OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_OFF 0x02
> +#define OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS (OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE | \
> + OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_OFF)
>
> static const struct dmi_system_id dmi_table[] = {
> {
> @@ -154,7 +158,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id dmi_table[] = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "ONE-NETBOOK"),
> DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "ONEXPLAYER APEX"),
> },
> - .driver_data = (void *)oxp_fly,
> + .driver_data = (void *)oxp_apex,
> },
> {
> .matches = {
> @@ -352,6 +356,7 @@ static umode_t tt_toggle_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> case oxp_x1:
> case oxp_g1_i:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return attr->mode;
> default:
> break;
> @@ -381,6 +386,7 @@ static ssize_t tt_toggle_store(struct device *dev,
> case oxp_fly:
> case oxp_mini_amd_pro:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> reg = OXP_TURBO_SWITCH_REG;
> mask = OXP_TURBO_TAKE_VAL;
> break;
> @@ -427,6 +433,7 @@ static ssize_t tt_toggle_show(struct device *dev,
> case oxp_fly:
> case oxp_mini_amd_pro:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> reg = OXP_TURBO_SWITCH_REG;
> mask = OXP_TURBO_TAKE_VAL;
> break;
> @@ -524,6 +531,7 @@ static bool oxp_psy_ext_supported(void)
> case oxp_g1_i:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> case oxp_fly:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return true;
> default:
> break;
> @@ -537,12 +545,24 @@ static int oxp_psy_ext_get_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> enum power_supply_property psp,
> union power_supply_propval *val)
> {
> + u8 limit_reg, inhibit_reg;
> long raw_val;
> int ret;
>
> + switch (board) {
> + case oxp_apex:
> + limit_reg = OXP_APEX_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG;
> + inhibit_reg = OXP_APEX_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG;
> + break;
> + default:
> + limit_reg = OXP_X1_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG;
> + inhibit_reg = OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> switch (psp) {
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
> - ret = read_from_ec(OXP_X1_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG, 1, &raw_val);
> + ret = read_from_ec(limit_reg, 1, &raw_val);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> if (raw_val < 0 || raw_val > 100)
> @@ -550,14 +570,14 @@ static int oxp_psy_ext_get_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> val->intval = raw_val;
> return 0;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR:
> - ret = read_from_ec(OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG, 1, &raw_val);
> + ret = read_from_ec(inhibit_reg, 1, &raw_val);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - if ((raw_val & OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS) ==
> - OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS)
> + if ((raw_val & OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS) ==
> + OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS)
> val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_INHIBIT_CHARGE;
> - else if ((raw_val & OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE) ==
> - OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE)
> + else if ((raw_val & OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE) ==
> + OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE)
> val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_INHIBIT_CHARGE_AWAKE;
> else
> val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_AUTO;
> @@ -573,29 +593,41 @@ static int oxp_psy_ext_set_prop(struct power_supply *psy,
> enum power_supply_property psp,
> const union power_supply_propval *val)
> {
> + u8 limit_reg, inhibit_reg;
> long raw_val;
>
> + switch (board) {
> + case oxp_apex:
> + limit_reg = OXP_APEX_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG;
> + inhibit_reg = OXP_APEX_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG;
> + break;
> + default:
> + limit_reg = OXP_X1_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG;
> + inhibit_reg = OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG;
I took this series as is, but in future you should look into implementing
all these variations through a struct in .driver_data, not using
ever-growing switch/case blocks.
--
i.
> + break;
> + }
> +
> switch (psp) {
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_CONTROL_END_THRESHOLD:
> if (val->intval < 0 || val->intval > 100)
> return -EINVAL;
> - return write_to_ec(OXP_X1_CHARGE_LIMIT_REG, val->intval);
> + return write_to_ec(limit_reg, val->intval);
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR:
> switch (val->intval) {
> case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_AUTO:
> raw_val = 0;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_INHIBIT_CHARGE_AWAKE:
> - raw_val = OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE;
> + raw_val = OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_AWAKE;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_BEHAVIOUR_INHIBIT_CHARGE:
> - raw_val = OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS;
> + raw_val = OXP_CHARGE_INHIBIT_MASK_ALWAYS;
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return write_to_ec(OXP_X1_CHARGE_INHIBIT_REG, raw_val);
> + return write_to_ec(inhibit_reg, raw_val);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -656,6 +688,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_enable(void)
> case oxp_x1:
> case oxp_g1_i:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return write_to_ec(OXP_SENSOR_PWM_ENABLE_REG, PWM_MODE_MANUAL);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -676,6 +709,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_disable(void)
> case oxp_x1:
> case oxp_g1_i:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return write_to_ec(OXP_SENSOR_PWM_ENABLE_REG, PWM_MODE_AUTO);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -696,6 +730,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_read(long *val)
> case oxp_x1:
> case oxp_g1_i:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return read_from_ec(OXP_SENSOR_PWM_ENABLE_REG, 1, val);
> default:
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -732,6 +767,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_fan_speed(long *val)
> case oxp_mini_amd_a07:
> case oxp_mini_amd_pro:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return read_from_ec(OXP_SENSOR_FAN_REG, 2, val);
> default:
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -764,6 +800,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_input_write(long val)
> case oxp_fly:
> case oxp_mini_amd_pro:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> return write_to_ec(OXP_SENSOR_PWM_REG, val);
> default:
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -803,6 +840,7 @@ static int oxp_pwm_input_read(long *val)
> case oxp_fly:
> case oxp_mini_amd_pro:
> case oxp_g1_a:
> + case oxp_apex:
> default:
> ret = read_from_ec(OXP_SENSOR_PWM_REG, 1, val);
> if (ret)
>
> base-commit: fd73f4a6659897191fa0d40695fe370925dd3780
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 19:04 Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-09-20 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] platform/x86: oxpec: Add OneXPlayer 3 quirk Antheas Kapenekakis
2026-09-20 22:29 ` Derek J. Clark
2026-09-20 22:28 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] platform/x86: oxpec: Fix Apex charge limit control Derek J. Clark
2026-10-05 17:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=272b2d3c-243a-cfb8-bf34-c6cffc7e5fec@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=eileen@one-netbook.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@antheas.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samsagax@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®