From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932270AbdJJOPH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:55751 "EHLO mail-io0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932117AbdJJOPE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:15:04 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDzcZ3iVNrdxzpsZG4H3Xq11GZ+4SECL7eFHL3v2sHWM41T7413jVQM4QSH9Afnxtl8Q5f6/A== Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] writeback: merge try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr() into caller To: Rakesh Pandit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: <20171009103440.GA29114@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com> <20171009120029.GL17917@quack2.suse.cz> <20171010094306.GA32628@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <2730ed85-a0a8-7da2-d91a-fe82fe215b75@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:15:02 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171010094306.GA32628@dhcp-216.srv.tuxera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/10/2017 03:43 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:00:29PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Mon 09-10-17 13:34:41, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >>> Since commit 925a6efb8ff0c ("Btrfs: stop using >>> try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr to flush delalloc") this function hasn't >>> been used outside so stop exporting it. >>> >>> In addition we merge it into try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() which is the >>> only caller. Also change return type of try_to_writeback_inodes_sb to >>> void as the only user ext4 doesn't care. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit >> >> Looks good. You can add: >> >> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara >> >> Honza > > As there are many writeback related changes on your tree would you be > okay queuing this up as well for-4.15 with above reviewed-by tag ? > > This should apply fine on your tree for-4.15. > > Let me know if that isn't okay. That's fine, I'll queue it up. -- Jens Axboe