From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753055AbbDBSYj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:24:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40987 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbbDBSYi (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:24:38 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <21857.1427983172@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel , Linux NFS Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] FS-Cache: Fixes for dead objects handling and operation cancellation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27321.1427999073.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:24:33 +0100 Message-ID: <27322.1427999073@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Could you pull these FS-Cache fixes please? > > I really think this is out of the merge window, and not at all appropriate. > > There have been no fscache changes since September of last year, it > can't suddenly be so urgent that you need to get things into -rc7. We weren't looking at -rc7 shortly when I first posted a pull request. The patchset does fix three oopses, but if you'd rather wait till the merge window, fine. David