From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752197AbbBVMa2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2015 07:30:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48742 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751850AbbBVMaZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2015 07:30:25 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20150222005125.GX29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150222005125.GX29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150221033452.GU29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> To: Al Viro Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [git pull] more vfs bits MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27358.1424608218.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:30:18 +0000 Message-ID: <27359.1424608218@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, I probably should've collapsed the per-fs patches together, or > held them back until the next cycle; I understand why David did them > that way (less painful rebasing that stuff) Actually, that's not why I did it that way. What I wanted was to get the wrappers upstream in this window then I could push the individual per-fs commits to the managers of those filesystems to go through their trees in the next cycle. I didn't rebase the scripted commits since I can just rerun the script. David