From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752520AbaIONFI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:05:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1053 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750920AbaIONFF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:05:05 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20140910212154.10752.23343.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20140910212154.10752.23343.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: jmorris@namei.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Miscellaneous fixes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27396.1410786297.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: <27397.1410786297@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi James, Thanks for pushing the first patch. Any thoughts on what to do with the remaining patches? #5 and #6 at least ought to go upstream as there's a potential memory leak fixed and #2 because the keyutils testsuite is failing without it. From what Mimi says, I think she's withdrawn her objection to #2. Thanks, David