mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Vollrath <tactii@gmail.com>
To: "Craig I. Hagan" <hagan@amazon.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] e1000e: fix flow control stuck off after link partner reset
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:26:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <274e9217-834f-43f1-8d71-e64b12052fff@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926132744.24777-1-hagan@amazon.com>

On 9/26/26 09:27, Craig I. Hagan wrote:
> On 2026-09-24, Matt Vollrath wrote:
>> I didn't try your patch, but there's a four line fix. Where the watchdog
>> resets just the PHY when the MAC exits DMoff state, set FLAG_RESTART_NOW
>> instead of resetting the PHY, then goto link_up. This works for me at
>> both 1500 and 9000 MTU.
> 
> Thanks Matt,
> I've tested this approach on two I219-LM boxes, each attached to a different switch:
> one a TP-Link TL-SG108PE V3, and the other a Cisco Catalyst 9200.
> 
> On the Cisco with jumbo frames, I'm seeing, via a diagnostic message, that
> the fix appears to fire and work. I have also noticed that I no longer see
> it on every boot, but this may be correct as I've not seen traffic stalls.
> 
> With 1500 mtu, I'm seeing it engage fairly regularly with the TP-Link but
> not the Cisco. I'm guessing it is related to how the Cisco negotiates. In both cases
> traffic doesn't seem to stall.
> 
> I think you are correct about flow control being a red herring since
> both switches advertise no pause (Flow Control: None) before and after
> recovery.
> 
> I'd like to drop my patch in favour of your fix.
> 
> How should I proceed, should I propose a patch with suggested-by you, or with your authorship and
> tested by me?

Feel free to add:

Suggested-by: Matt Vollrath <tactii@gmail.com>

> 
> For completeness, here is the diff I tested (I added an e_info so I could see it fire on the
> test rig; happy to drop that line - it isn't needed for the fix):

I would drop the e_info.

> 
> 
> 
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -5254,9 +5254,16 @@
>   					usleep_range(10000, 20000);
>   					pcim_state = er32(STATUS);
>   
> -					/* Checking if MAC exited DMoff state */
> -					if (!(pcim_state & E1000_STATUS_PCIM_STATE))
> -						e1000_phy_hw_reset(&adapter->hw);
> +					/* Checking if MAC exited DMoff state.  A bare
> +					 * PHY reset here does not re-run the jumbo
> +					 * workaround (e1000_lv_jumbo_workaround_ich8lan),
> +					 * so request a full reset instead, which does.
> +					 */

My two cents is that this comment is over-specific. In most places a bare PHY reset
is not used, so the transition is toward less exceptional.

> +					if (!(pcim_state & E1000_STATUS_PCIM_STATE)) {
> +						e_info("full reset on DMoff exit to restore jumbo-frame configuration\n");
> +						adapter->flags |= FLAG_RESTART_NOW;
> +						goto link_up;
> +					}
>   				}
>   			}
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-27 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 23:58 Craig I. Hagan
2026-09-24 18:07 ` Matt Vollrath
2026-09-26 13:27   ` Craig I. Hagan
2026-09-27 16:26     ` Matt Vollrath [this message]
2026-09-28 17:02 ` [PATCH iwl-net v2] e1000e: restore jumbo config after DMoff exit Craig I. Hagan
2026-09-28 19:23   ` Matt Vollrath
2026-09-28 21:05     ` [PATCH iwl-net v3] " Craig I. Hagan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=274e9217-834f-43f1-8d71-e64b12052fff@gmail.com \
    --to=tactii@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hagan@amazon.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®