From: Youling Tang <youling.tang@linux.dev>
To: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] LoongArch: Add kexec_file support
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:18:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27513334-3086-4353-bf6c-fdee082a8ce8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJsGg8__ppyBrkfL@pie>
Hi, Yao
On 2025/8/12 17:43, Yao Zi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 03:06:23PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>> On 2025/8/12 14:15, Youling Tang wrote:
>>> Hi, Yao
>>> On 2025/8/12 01:06, Yao Zi wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 05:26:55PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>>>>> From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@kylinos.cn>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds support for kexec_file on LoongArch.
>>>>>
>>>>> The image_load() as two parts:
>>>>> - the first part loads the kernel image (vmlinuz.efi or vmlinux.efi)
>>>>> - the second part loads other segments (eg: initrd, cmdline)
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, pez(vmlinuz.efi) and pei(vmlinux.efi) format images
>>>>> are supported,
>>>>> but ELF format is not supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@kylinos.cn>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 8 ++
>>>>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h | 18 ++++
>>>>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h | 12 +++
>>>>> arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c | 112
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 33 ++++--
>>>>> arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 46 +++++++++
>>>>> 7 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> ...
>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c
>>>>> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..fdd1845b4e2e
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_image.c
> ...
>
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * The location of the kernel segment may make it
>>>>> impossible to satisfy
>>>>> + * the other segment requirements, so we try repeatedly to find a
>>>>> + * location that will work.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + while ((ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf)) == 0) {
>>>>> + /* Try to load additional data */
>>>>> + kernel_segment = &image->segment[kernel_segment_number];
>>>>> + ret = load_other_segments(image, kernel_segment->mem,
>>>>> + kernel_segment->memsz, initrd,
>>>>> + initrd_len, cmdline, cmdline_len);
>>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * We couldn't find space for the other segments; erase the
>>>>> + * kernel segment and try the next available hole.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + image->nr_segments -= 1;
>>>>> + kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
>>>>> + kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + pr_err("Could not find any suitable kernel location!");
>>>>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + kernel_segment = &image->segment[kernel_segment_number];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Make sure the second kernel jumps to the correct
>>>>> "kernel_entry". */
>>>>> + image->start = kernel_segment->mem + h->kernel_entry -
>>>>> text_offset;
>>>> A non-relocatable loongarch kernel cannot be loaded to arbitrary
>>>> address. Thus this loading function seems to only work for relocatable
>>>> kernels, maybe it's better to leave a comment indicating the limitation.
>>>>
>>>> For now, we don't seem to have a way to find out whether the kernel is
>>>> relocatable (for example, a flag in kernel image header), so it's
>>>> impossible to point out whether the loaded kernel boots fine with
>>>> arbitrary loading address...
>>> LoongArch enables the relocation of the kernel when the kdump
>>> feature is enabled.
>>>
>>> config ARCH_SELECTS_CRASH_DUMP
>>> def_bool y
>>> depends on CRASH_DUMP
>>> select RELOCATABLE
>>>
> This only means the currently-running kernel is relocatable, not the one
> being exec'ed, right?
No.
>> When enabling KEXEC_FILE, the RELOCATABLE configuration should
>> also be enabled. Both kexec and kdump require this.
> I'm not sure whether you're talking about the running kernel or the one
> that is going to be exec'ed. This method of kernel loading requires the
> exec'ed kernel being relocatable, not the currently running one.
>
> And I think it's totally reasonable to use KEXEC_FILE for non-crash-dump
> purpose, for example, linuxboot. It'll be confusing to the user if the
> system just hangs after booting a non-relocatable kernel, which is hard
> to debug.
>
> Thus IMHO we should ideally refuse to load non-relocatable kernels, or
> add a FIXME comment to indicate the situation that it's impossible to
> determine whether the exec'ed image is relocatable.
The first kernel and the second kernel are generally the same kernel
(the same image). When KEXEC_FILE is enabled and RELOCATEABLE
is enabled by default, it has been forcibly guaranteed that both the
first kernel and the second kernel are relocatable kernels regardless
of kexec/kdump operations.
Unless the second kernel it loads is an older version of the kernel (the
older version of the kernel does not use the default configuration, with
CONFIG_KEXEC enabled but CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP disabled, this is not acorrect
usage).
Thanks,
Youling.
>> Youling.
>>> After enabling the relocation, LoongArch is the PIE kernel. For
>>> more details, please refer to commit d8da19fbdedd ("LoongArch:
>>> Add support for kernel relocation")
> Best regards.
> Yao Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 9:26 [PATCH 0/6] Add kexec_file support for LoongArch Youling Tang
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] LoongArch: Add struct loongarch_image_header for kernel image Youling Tang
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] LoongArch: Add kexec_file support Youling Tang
2025-08-11 14:07 ` Huacai Chen
2025-08-12 1:21 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-12 1:53 ` Yanteng Si
2025-08-12 9:32 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-13 1:15 ` Yanteng Si
2025-08-12 2:53 ` Huacai Chen
2025-08-11 17:06 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-12 2:39 ` Huacai Chen
2025-08-12 7:56 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-12 6:15 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-12 7:06 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-12 9:43 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-13 2:18 ` Youling Tang [this message]
2025-08-13 3:24 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-16 5:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] LoongArch/kexec_file: Add initrd loading Youling Tang
2025-08-11 14:12 ` Huacai Chen
2025-08-12 2:38 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-12 3:03 ` Huacai Chen
2025-08-11 17:58 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-12 4:05 ` Youling Tang
2025-08-12 6:25 ` Yao Zi
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] LoongArch/kexec_file: Add crash dump support Youling Tang
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] LoongArch/kexec_file: Add "mem" parameter to limit memory usage of kdump kernel Youling Tang
2025-08-11 9:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] LoongArch: Enable CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE Youling Tang
2025-08-11 16:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add kexec_file support for LoongArch Vincent Li
2025-08-12 6:21 ` Youling Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27513334-3086-4353-bf6c-fdee082a8ce8@linux.dev \
--to=youling.tang@linux.dev \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ziyao@disroot.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®