mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: SAURAV GIREPUNJE <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, elder@kernel.org, vireshk@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: bootrom: fix uninitialized variables
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:10:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <275d6509-ebd2-f00e-176d-abf97ae834da@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200125121459.GA2792@google.com>

On 1/25/20 6:14 AM, SAURAV GIREPUNJE wrote:
> On 25/01/20 11:00 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:14:03PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>>> fix uninitialized variables issue found using static code analysis tool
>>
>> Which tool is that?
>>
>>> (error) Uninitialized variable: offset
>>> (error) Uninitialized variable: size
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
>>> index a8efb86..9eabeb3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/bootrom.c
>>> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int gb_bootrom_get_firmware(struct gb_operation *op)
>>>       struct gb_bootrom_get_firmware_request *firmware_request;
>>>       struct gb_bootrom_get_firmware_response *firmware_response;
>>>       struct device *dev = &op->connection->bundle->dev;
>>> -    unsigned int offset, size;
>>> +    unsigned int offset = 0, size = 0;
>>>       enum next_request_type next_request;
>>>       int ret = 0;
>>
>> I think this has come up in the past, and while the code in question is
>> overly complicated and confuses static checkers as well as humans, it
>> looks correct to me.
>>
>> Please make sure to verify the output of any tools before posting
>> patches based on them.
>>
>> Johan
> I used cppcheck tool .

Implied in Johan's question is a suggestion.

When you propose a patch that addresses something flagged by a
tool of some kind, it is good practice to identify the tool in
the patch description, and even better, give an example of how
the tool was invoked when reported the problem you're fixing.
Sometimes people even include the output of the tool, though
I think that can sometimes be a bit much.

And as you have now heard several times, do not blindly trust
the output of these tools.  They're intended to call attention
to things for you to examine; they are no match for a human,
and things they tell you about are not guaranteed to be real
problems.

					-Alex

> _______________________________________________ 
> greybus-dev mailing list
> greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/greybus-dev


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-27 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-25  8:44 Saurav Girepunje
2020-01-25 10:00 ` Johan Hovold
2020-01-25 12:14   ` SAURAV GIREPUNJE
2020-01-27 14:10     ` Alex Elder [this message]
2020-01-27  8:09 ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=275d6509-ebd2-f00e-176d-abf97ae834da@linaro.org \
    --to=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®