From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>,
syzbot
<bot+3401d9494b9380f7244bcc7fec49680878fccba6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - wait for data at beginning of recvmsg
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:28:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2780580.3j7i2QamZF@tauon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129102234.GA24171@gondor.apana.org.au>
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 11:22:34 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int _aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
> > msghdr *msg,>
> > size_t usedpages = 0; /* [in] RX bufs to be used from user */
> > size_t processed = 0; /* [in] TX bufs to be consumed */
> >
> > + if (ctx->more) {
> > + err = af_alg_wait_for_data(sk, flags);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
>
> So what happens when sendmsg hasn't been called at all? In that
> case ctx->more would be zero, and we would skip the wait right?
Right, but wouldn't that be the correct order of operation? If somebody does
not call sendmsg, he simply did not send any data. And that is yet a proper
operation (for encryption) as it obtains the tag for the "null" data.
In case we have decryption and yet we received "null" data (e.g. sendmsg was
not called) which implies the kernel received too little data (decryption at
least requires the tag), aead_sufficient_data will return the error.
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 18:56 general protection fault in blkcipher_walk_done syzbot
2017-11-28 5:37 ` Eric Biggers
2017-11-28 7:53 ` Eric Biggers
2017-11-28 8:31 ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-28 9:03 ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-28 21:33 ` [PATCH v2] crypto: AF_ALG - race-free access of encryption flag Stephan Müller
2017-11-28 22:40 ` Eric Biggers
2017-11-28 23:02 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-29 6:48 ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-29 7:10 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-29 7:17 ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-29 10:17 ` [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - wait for data at beginning of recvmsg Stephan Müller
2017-11-29 10:22 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-29 10:28 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2017-11-29 10:42 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-29 11:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephan Müller
2017-12-11 11:45 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-29 11:05 ` [PATCH v2] crypto: AF_ALG - race-free access of encryption flag Stephan Müller
2017-11-29 12:17 ` Herbert Xu
2017-12-11 19:10 ` general protection fault in blkcipher_walk_done Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2780580.3j7i2QamZF@tauon.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=bot+3401d9494b9380f7244bcc7fec49680878fccba6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®