From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422991AbeBPAVP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:21:15 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:23069 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422716AbeBPAVO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:21:14 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,519,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="18129076" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] x86: Disabling PTI in compatibility mode To: Nadav Amit , Ingo Molnar References: <20180215163602.61162-1-namit@vmware.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Willy Tarreau , Nadav Amit , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <27a0082c-fadb-792a-740e-70932d51f1b5@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:21:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180215163602.61162-1-namit@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/15/2018 08:35 AM, Nadav Amit wrote: > I removed the PTI disabling while SMEP is unsupported, although I > must admit I did not fully understand why it is required. Do you mean you don't fully understand how PTI gives SMEP-like behavior on non-SMEP hardware?