From: "Fang Hongjie(方洪杰)" <hongjiefang@asrmicro.com>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before SCSI EH
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:08:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27ad241130a34ece8d2645b687f6ffc7@exch02.asrmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c2f95f00b484bca9c5df97219230acc@exch02.asrmicro.com>
> From: Peter Wang (王信友) [mailto:peter.wang@mediatek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 2:55 PM
> To: beanhuo@micron.com; James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com;
> Fang Hongjie(方洪杰) <hongjiefang@asrmicro.com>;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; avri.altman@wdc.com;
> martin.petersen@oracle.com; bvanassche@acm.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: core: handle PM commands timeout before
> SCSI EH
>
>
> On Tue, 2026-06-02 at 20:41 +0800, Hongjie Fang wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * ufshcd_link_recovery() may already have completed @scmd,
> > e.g. via
> > + * the existing MCQ force-completion path.
> > + */
> > + if (!test_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state)) {
> > + if (!hba->mcq_enabled) {
> >
>
> Hi Hongjie,
>
> MCQ will complete all uncompleted scmd by setting force_compl.
> Hence, if there are still uncompleted scmd, it should be
> in legacy mode, and there is no need to check
> if (!hba->mcq_enabled), right?
>
The !hba->mcq_enabled check is only for clearing outstanding_reqs,
which is the legacy single-doorbell software bitmap.
MCQ does not use outstanding_reqs for request tracking.
>
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(scmd);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock,
> > flags);
> > + __clear_bit(rq->tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba-
> > >outstanding_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > +
> > + set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
> >
>
> Why does MCQ mode set DID_REQUEUE, while legacy mode sets
> DID_TIME_OUT?
>
Normal SCSI PM commands use DID_REQUEUE, matching the existing
MCQ force-completion behavior. Reserved internal device-management
commands continue to use DID_TIME_OUT, right ?
Best.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 12:41 Hongjie Fang
2026-06-02 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-06-03 5:16 ` Fang Hongjie(方洪杰)
2026-06-03 6:55 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
[not found] ` <5c2f95f00b484bca9c5df97219230acc@exch02.asrmicro.com>
2026-06-03 11:08 ` Fang Hongjie(方洪杰) [this message]
2026-06-04 5:39 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
[not found] ` <f2a49399526f44a2a3f94c90229330ea@exch02.asrmicro.com>
2026-06-04 15:24 ` Fang Hongjie(方洪杰)
2026-06-03 16:21 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27ad241130a34ece8d2645b687f6ffc7@exch02.asrmicro.com \
--to=hongjiefang@asrmicro.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®