mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>,
	Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>,
	akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: Remove custom swap functions in favor of built-in sort swap
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:41:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27b7f0e6-b668-407b-abf8-30613fcf732c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4b3ab50-02af-42f2-b937-dcbb92b4f0d2@suse.com>


On 8/18/24 7:36 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> On 8/11/24 03:53, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
>> The custom swap functions used in ocfs2 do not perform any special
>> operations and can be replaced with the built-in swap function of sort.
>> This change not only reduces code size but also improves efficiency,
>> especially in scenarios where CONFIG_RETPOLINE is enabled, as it makes
>> indirect function calls more expensive.
>>
>> By using the built-in swap, we avoid these costly indirect function
>> calls, leading to better performance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> 
> Looks good to me
> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> 

Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

>> ---
>> Note: Build test only.
>>
>>   fs/ocfs2/dir.c          | 12 +-----------
>>   fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 13 +++----------
>>   fs/ocfs2/xattr.c        | 15 +++------------
>>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> index f0beb173dbba..fa5d0819a997 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -3511,16 +3511,6 @@ static int dx_leaf_sort_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   -static void dx_leaf_sort_swap(void *a, void *b, int size)
>> -{
>> -    struct ocfs2_dx_entry *entry1 = a;
>> -    struct ocfs2_dx_entry *entry2 = b;
>> -
>> -    BUG_ON(size != sizeof(*entry1));
>> -
>> -    swap(*entry1, *entry2);
>> -}
>> -
>>   static int ocfs2_dx_leaf_same_major(struct ocfs2_dx_leaf *dx_leaf)
>>   {
>>       struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *dl_list = &dx_leaf->dl_list;
>> @@ -3781,7 +3771,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_rebalance(struct ocfs2_super *osb, struct inode *dir,
>>        */
>>       sort(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_entries, num_used,
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_dx_entry), dx_leaf_sort_cmp,
>> -         dx_leaf_sort_swap);
>> +         NULL);
>>         ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, dx_leaf_bh);
>>   diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
>> index 1f303b1adf1a..4f85508538fc 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
>> @@ -1392,13 +1392,6 @@ static int cmp_refcount_rec_by_cpos(const void *a, const void *b)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   -static void swap_refcount_rec(void *a, void *b, int size)
>> -{
>> -    struct ocfs2_refcount_rec *l = a, *r = b;
>> -
>> -    swap(*l, *r);
>> -}
>> -
>>   /*
>>    * The refcount cpos are ordered by their 64bit cpos,
>>    * But we will use the low 32 bit to be the e_cpos in the b-tree.
>> @@ -1474,7 +1467,7 @@ static int ocfs2_divide_leaf_refcount_block(struct buffer_head *ref_leaf_bh,
>>        */
>>       sort(&rl->rl_recs, le16_to_cpu(rl->rl_used),
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_refcount_rec),
>> -         cmp_refcount_rec_by_low_cpos, swap_refcount_rec);
>> +         cmp_refcount_rec_by_low_cpos, NULL);
>>         ret = ocfs2_find_refcount_split_pos(rl, &cpos, &split_index);
>>       if (ret) {
>> @@ -1499,11 +1492,11 @@ static int ocfs2_divide_leaf_refcount_block(struct buffer_head *ref_leaf_bh,
>>         sort(&rl->rl_recs, le16_to_cpu(rl->rl_used),
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_refcount_rec),
>> -         cmp_refcount_rec_by_cpos, swap_refcount_rec);
>> +         cmp_refcount_rec_by_cpos, NULL);
>>         sort(&new_rl->rl_recs, le16_to_cpu(new_rl->rl_used),
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_refcount_rec),
>> -         cmp_refcount_rec_by_cpos, swap_refcount_rec);
>> +         cmp_refcount_rec_by_cpos, NULL);
>>         *split_cpos = cpos;
>>       return 0;
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> index 35c0cc2a51af..0e58a5ce539e 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
>> @@ -4167,15 +4167,6 @@ static int cmp_xe(const void *a, const void *b)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   -static void swap_xe(void *a, void *b, int size)
>> -{
>> -    struct ocfs2_xattr_entry *l = a, *r = b, tmp;
>> -
>> -    tmp = *l;
>> -    memcpy(l, r, sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry));
>> -    memcpy(r, &tmp, sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry));
>> -}
>> -
>>   /*
>>    * When the ocfs2_xattr_block is filled up, new bucket will be created
>>    * and all the xattr entries will be moved to the new bucket.
>> @@ -4241,7 +4232,7 @@ static void ocfs2_cp_xattr_block_to_bucket(struct inode *inode,
>>       trace_ocfs2_cp_xattr_block_to_bucket_end(offset, size, off_change);
>>         sort(target + offset, count, sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry),
>> -         cmp_xe, swap_xe);
>> +         cmp_xe, NULL);
>>   }
>>     /*
>> @@ -4436,7 +4427,7 @@ static int ocfs2_defrag_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
>>        */
>>       sort(entries, le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count),
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry),
>> -         cmp_xe_offset, swap_xe);
>> +         cmp_xe_offset, NULL);
>>         /* Move all name/values to the end of the bucket. */
>>       xe = xh->xh_entries;
>> @@ -4478,7 +4469,7 @@ static int ocfs2_defrag_xattr_bucket(struct inode *inode,
>>       /* sort the entries by their name_hash. */
>>       sort(entries, le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count),
>>            sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry),
>> -         cmp_xe, swap_xe);
>> +         cmp_xe, NULL);
>>         buf = bucket_buf;
>>       for (i = 0; i < bucket->bu_blocks; i++, buf += blocksize)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-19  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-10 19:53 Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-08-18 11:36 ` Heming Zhao
2024-08-19  2:41   ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2024-08-19  2:45     ` Heming Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27b7f0e6-b668-407b-abf8-30613fcf732c@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®