From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268335AbUIQGXz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:23:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268397AbUIQGXz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:23:55 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:4502 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268335AbUIQGXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:23:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:23:52 +0200 (MEST) From: "Alexander Stohr" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@osdl.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: How about a new development series kernel? X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #15156664 Message-ID: <28141.1095402232@www21.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The below quotes do originate from the linux-usb-devel mailing list. They were created in respect to the code for ub.c and its releated files. > > I really wonder how such a yet unfinished module > > ever made it to merge into a stable kernel series. > > And where would our "development series" kernel be? :) Other than that i observed some other rather more critical code like the nfs implementation got broken which in turn lead to the usage of a brown paperbag. How about cloning a Linux-2.7.0 tree from maybe the upcoming 2.6.9 release? -Alex. PS: I am reading this list via the MARC servers. Feel free if you want to CC me in your replys. -- NEU: GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail +++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++