mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-next] cpufreq: ondemand: Calculate gradient of CPU load to early increase frequency
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:38:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2826152.N3vY2cE3iV@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51561556.7020904@semaphore.gr>

On Saturday, March 30, 2013 12:27:34 AM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 03:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 21 February 2013 23:09, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > 
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> In case you are interested in this patch I rebased it to the latest linux-pm/bleeding-edge.

Thanks!

I have a backlog of cpufreq patches to sort out, so it may take some time till
I get to this one.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ------------------------------------------
> Instead of checking only the absolute value of CPU load_freq to increase
> frequency, we detect forthcoming CPU load rise and increase frequency
> earlier.
> 
> Every sampling rate, we calculate the gradient of load_freq. If it is
> too steep we assume that the load most probably will go over
> up_threshold in next iteration(s) and we increase frequency immediately.
> 
> New tuners are introduced:
> - early_demand: to enable this functionality (disabled by default).
> - grad_up_threshold: over this gradient of load we will increase
> frequency immediately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |  1 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 41e5e56..1d9abc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  		} else {
>  			od_dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
>  			od_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
> +			od_dbs_info->prev_load_freq = 0;
>  			od_ops->powersave_bias_init_cpu(cpu);
>  		}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> index 1f7de13..c33b37a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s {
>  	unsigned int freq_hi_jiffies;
>  	unsigned int rate_mult;
>  	unsigned int sample_type:1;
> +	unsigned int prev_load_freq;
>  };
>  
>  struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
> @@ -113,6 +114,8 @@ struct od_dbs_tuners {
>  	unsigned int adj_up_threshold;
>  	unsigned int powersave_bias;
>  	unsigned int io_is_busy;
> +	unsigned int grad_up_threshold;
> +	unsigned int early_demand;
>  };
>  
>  struct cs_dbs_tuners {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> index 29ed48a..6cd59a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>  #define DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_DIFFERENTIAL		(10)
>  #define DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD		(80)
>  #define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR		(1)
> +#define DEF_GRAD_UP_THRESHOLD			(50)
>  #define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR		(100000)
>  #define MICRO_FREQUENCY_DOWN_DIFFERENTIAL	(3)
>  #define MICRO_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD		(95)
> @@ -168,11 +169,26 @@ static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load_freq)
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy;
>  	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
>  	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> +	int boost_freq = 0;
>  
>  	dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the gradient of load_freq. If it is too steep we assume
> +	 * that the load will go over up_threshold in next iteration(s) and
> +	 * we increase the frequency immediately
> +	 */
> +	if (od_tuners->early_demand) {
> +		if (load_freq > dbs_info->prev_load_freq &&
> +		   (load_freq - dbs_info->prev_load_freq >
> +		    od_tuners->grad_up_threshold * policy->cur))
> +			boost_freq = 1;
> +
> +		dbs_info->prev_load_freq = load_freq;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Check for frequency increase */
> -	if (load_freq > od_tuners->up_threshold * policy->cur) {
> +	if (boost_freq || load_freq > od_tuners->up_threshold * policy->cur) {
>  		/* If switching to max speed, apply sampling_down_factor */
>  		if (policy->cur < policy->max)
>  			dbs_info->rate_mult =
> @@ -454,12 +470,47 @@ static ssize_t store_powersave_bias(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t store_grad_up_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
> +	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> +	unsigned int input;
> +	int ret;
> +	ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
> +
> +	if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD ||
> +			input < MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD) {
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	od_tuners->grad_up_threshold = input;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t store_early_demand(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +		const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy->governor_data;
> +	struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
> +	unsigned int input;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
> +	if (ret != 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	od_tuners->early_demand = !!input;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
>  show_one(od, sampling_rate, sampling_rate);
>  show_one(od, io_is_busy, io_is_busy);
>  show_one(od, up_threshold, up_threshold);
>  show_one(od, sampling_down_factor, sampling_down_factor);
>  show_one(od, ignore_nice, ignore_nice);
>  show_one(od, powersave_bias, powersave_bias);
> +show_one(od, grad_up_threshold, grad_up_threshold);
> +show_one(od, early_demand, early_demand);
>  declare_show_sampling_rate_min();
>  
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(sampling_rate);
> @@ -468,6 +519,8 @@ cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(up_threshold);
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(sampling_down_factor);
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(ignore_nice);
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(powersave_bias);
> +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(grad_up_threshold);
> +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(early_demand);
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(sampling_rate_min);
>  
>  static struct attribute *dbs_attributes[] = {
> @@ -478,6 +531,8 @@ static struct attribute *dbs_attributes[] = {
>  	&ignore_nice.attr,
>  	&powersave_bias.attr,
>  	&io_is_busy.attr,
> +	&grad_up_threshold.attr,
> +	&early_demand.attr,
>  	NULL
>  };
>  
> @@ -525,9 +580,11 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
>  	}
>  
>  	tuners->sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR;
> +	tuners->grad_up_threshold = DEF_GRAD_UP_THRESHOLD;
>  	tuners->ignore_nice = 0;
>  	tuners->powersave_bias = 0;
>  	tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
> +	tuners->early_demand = 0;
>  
>  	dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
>  	mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex);
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-29 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-20 20:50 [PATCH " Stratos Karafotis
2013-02-21  4:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-21 11:31   ` [PATCH v2 " Stratos Karafotis
2013-02-21 15:33     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-21 17:39       ` [PATCH v3 " Stratos Karafotis
2013-02-22  1:56         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22  5:57           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-22 12:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-29 22:27           ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-03-29 22:38             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-04-02 13:50             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-02 15:49               ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-02 22:55                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-03  6:31 stratosk
2013-04-03  6:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-03 11:14   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-03 23:30     ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-04  4:54       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05 19:50         ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-09 16:56           ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-10  3:22             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-16 18:34               ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-26 14:41             ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-04-04  6:47 stratosk
2013-04-04  6:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04  7:21 stratosk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2826152.N3vY2cE3iV@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®